Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Separate communities for Astronomy, Biology, Chemistry, Earth Science. [closed]
Closed as too generic by luap42 on Dec 14, 2020 at 10:23
This post contains multiple questions or has many possible indistinguishable correct answers or requires extraordinary long answers.
This question was closed; new answers can no longer be added. Users with the reopen privilege may vote to reopen this question if it has been improved or closed incorrectly.
I'm fazed that a community for Biology and/or Chemistry hasn't been proposed, not least because Codidact hasn't launched any community for any of the five natural sciences. I'm not referring to Scientific Speculation that already launched, or Physics that has been proposed.
To feed all these birds with one seed, I propose separate communities for Astronomy, Biology, Chemistry, Earth Science.
0 answers
2 comments
Suggesting four different communities in one single post makes it rather hard to know what's being discussed. Would you be willing to either (a) make it one proposal for a single community to cover all four subject areas (we could split later, as there was discussion regarding Software Development, or categories could be used to separate the subject areas), or (b) make one separate proposal for each community? Either way would make it much more clear what's being talked about. — Canina about 1 month ago
Astronomy/Astrophysics should probably be a category sorting below a Physics site? — Lundin about 1 month ago