Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics

Dashboard
Notifications
Mark all as read
Site Proposals

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Biology community [closed]

+0
−3

Closed as duplicate by Monica Cellio‭ on Feb 14, 2021 at 18:28

This question has been addressed elsewhere. See: Biology proposal

This question was closed; new answers can no longer be added. Users with the reopen privilege may vote to reopen this question if it has been improved or closed incorrectly.

Proposing a Biology community

Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

7 comments

The comments about SE were unnecessary here, so I've edited them out. That's left this post a bit bare, so you could consider adding some more detail about what you'd like to see in a Biology site. ArtOfCode‭ 3 months ago

Based on the revision history here, I would also like to note that we do also have a Code of Conduct here on Codidact. Bashing trans people is just as much against the Code of Conduct here as it may be anywhere else; something to keep in mind for future interactions. Mithical‭ 3 months ago

I am closing as the current post (after inappropriate content was removed) has no useful information - e.g., scope, type of questions, special features needed, etc. manassehkatz‭ 3 months ago

@manassehkatz I don't see how this post is different from the Statistics one or the Change My View one in its initial version. Maybe the TO or other people intended to elaborate on that proposal. Zerotime‭ 3 months ago

@Zerotime Each of those was essentially a one-liner, but where the one line was constructive. This one started off with "The reason Codidact was necessary..." - which is something quite different. manassehkatz‭ 3 months ago

Show 2 more comments

0 answers