Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics

Dashboard
Notifications
Mark all as read
Site Proposals

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Software Engineering && Mathematics && Computer Science [closed]

+10
−2

Closed as too generic by Monica Cellio‭ on Oct 25, 2020 at 21:46

This post contains multiple questions or has many possible indistinguishable correct answers or requires extraordinary long answers.

This question was closed; new answers can no longer be added. Users with the reopen privilege may vote to reopen this question if it has been improved or closed incorrectly.

I am a coder mathematician computer scientist and would love to see a community for each of those identities.

  1. Software Engineering: This strikes me as an ideal early community. It's users are likely to provide useful bug reports and technical feedback and are likely to have a high threshold for unpolished or incomplete software.
  2. Mathematics: Mathematicians tend to be on the cutting edge of new internet technologies. We were among the first adopters of Google+ (RIP) and currently have a massive community on SE. We are also among the central driving forces of the Open Access movement in academia, demonstrating a cultural affinity for the ideals behind FOSS and Creative Commons.
  3. Computer Science: I would think this community would share the good qualities of the previous two communities.

I am not yet familiar with how Codidact works, but if it takes someone to do the legwork of "making" the community, I am happy to volunteer.

Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

5 comments

Welcome! We'll want to separate this into one post per proposed site to make discussion easier, but first, as Art said, we'll want to make sure we'll have users for any of these. All of these topics are rich and should have lots of interest; are you working with any others (whether from SE or elsewhere) who'd be interested in helping to build these sites? Monica Cellio‭ 12 months ago

I'm interested in a maths site, particularly enumerative combinatorics. But learning a lesson from SE, it would need a clear policy on "problem statement questions" (i.e. effortless homework posts and other questions which appear so to be) from the start and ruthless enforcement. Peter Taylor‭ 12 months ago

This "intersection" site is interesting: I'm often having to write code for specific mathematical problems in combinatorics. Questions are off-topic on math.SE because it requires knowledge of C++ (or GAP, or some other mathematics software package), but it's pointless posting on StackOverflow because it requires understanding combinatorial concepts. becky82‭ 9 months ago

Perhaps the title of this post should be Software Engineering & Mathematics & Computer Science instead, unless each depends on the one prior. mbomb007‭ 9 months ago

We now have Software Development and Mathematics, so I'm closing this. (Discussing multiple proposals together was tricky anyway.) Monica Cellio‭ 6 months ago

3 answers

+9
−1

Let me refer you to an answer I wrote a few days ago.

One person can't start a community - it simply doesn't work. To get a successful site moving, there needs to be a group of people willing to put in the time and effort to seed and curate high-quality content and to get the word out about the community. If you're willing to do that, that's a great start! What you need next is other people who are also interested in helping you do so. "If you build it, they will come" is a punchy line, but it's not much more — setting a site up and hoping doesn't work, it needs continuous effort over a lengthy period of time.

Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comments

+4
−0

My thoughts regarding a software engineering site:

Overall, the site needs to be relaxed and tolerant. There needs to be a list of what is on topic and what isn't, but it shouldn't be set in stone, least of all initially. We simply can't have a site where people burst in with different opinions of what's in scope and therefore close questions out of the blue. Better then to close one too few than one too many.

The community needs to have a higher tolerance towards subjective and opinion-based questions than other sites dedicated to practical programming or science. Software design in particular is fairly subjective in itself and software design questions must have a place on the site.

That being said, answers should preferably be backed with sources rather than opinions.


On-topic

  • Software design, architecture and modeling.
  • Practical design and design review - which item goes where, when using a certain technology.
  • Software development process and project cycles specific to software engineering (requirements, design, testing etc)
  • Best practices, where there is "best" criteria in the question and answers can be given based on sources and expertise consensus.
  • Software life cycle management, including build configurations, version control, release and deployment.
  • Software documentation and tools used for such.

Off-topic

  • Implementing, trouble-shooting or explaining specific code.
  • The use of computers or software for other purposes than software engineering.
  • System/network/server administration.
  • Recommendation questions about which tools, libraries, technologies etc to use or where to find them.
  • Project management questions not specific to software engineering.
  • Career/study advise and workplace issues.
  • Financing and legal advise.

Unclear and open for discussion:

  • Database management may or may not be on-topic depending on if there will be a separate site or not. In case there will be a separate site, we should not have overlapping scopes.
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comments

+0
−0

This post covers three different proposed sites and has several upvotes, indicating some level of interest -- but it's hard to tell which parts. See also the recent proposal for Professional Coding, which overlaps two of the three proposed here. I'd love to see some well-developed proposals for technical communities. As another answer says, that includes gathering people who are interested in building the community here. I encourage anyone who wants to pursue any of these ideas to create a new proposal covering one site in more detail. Thanks!

Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comments