Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics

Dashboard
Notifications
Mark all as read
Site Proposals

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Cooking Codidact site

+8
−0

I'd like a community dedicated to professional and amateur cooks and chefs, analogous with https://cooking.stackexchange.com/.


Update: Launched. Let's continue the scope discussions there.

Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

8 comments

I am an amateur cook and, in the wake of current world events, have been doing even more cooking and have no place to ask my questions. I would participate in a cooking site if we had one. Do we have other interested participants? Monica Cellio‭ 8 months ago

I might be interested in participating in a cooking site... not sure whether we have enough interest overall without getting an existing community interested, though. ArtOfCode‭ 8 months ago

A few months old, but relevant to this topic: Considering Leaving Stack Exchange manassehkatz‭ 8 months ago

I certainly would be willing to contribute. We definitely need a recipe category... yum! Sigma‭ 8 months ago

@Sigma or maybe a blog category that can support both recipes and "technique" posts, with good use of tags? Or did you mean recipe requests? That could work if structured, sort of like Photo's gear recommendations. "I need a recipe for X" bad, "I need a recipe for X following these constraints" workable. Monica Cellio‭ 8 months ago

Show 3 more comments

5 answers

+4
−0

Fresh start

I wasn't active on the SE site, so I don't know what the state of things is like there. But this site isn't being founded by SE people who want to emigrate; I see no discussion on their meta about moving, though there was some discussion of unhappiness a few months ago. Rather, this site is being proposed by people who, as far as I can tell, are starting anew with a cooking site here.

I would therefore argue for starting with a blank slate and not importing data. If there are some special questions there that we want to pull over, we can do those. And if you participated there and want to bring over your content, we can do that. But let's not import thousands of questions from Seasoned Advice; people here aren't overly connected to that site, and we don't even know the value of the content we'd be importing.

Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

2 comments

How is the migration set up for pulling questions from meta? There's a question on cooking.meta.stackexchange.com about vocabulary differences between dialects of English which is extremely detailed and useful. Peter Taylor‭ 8 months ago

@PeterTaylor I'm not sure off-hand, but I'm confident that we can do something there, even if it's a more manual process for a handful of meta posts. Monica Cellio‭ 8 months ago

+3
−0

Scope Clarification

(this is a question, not an answer)

How broad or focused should this site be? Is it restricted solely to the preparation of food, or are related topics like presentation, nutrition, food history, wine pairings, food sourcing and selection etc. also welcome?

In other words, is this a Cooking community or a Foodies community?

Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment

Launched, so we can now continue these important discussions on meta there. Looking forward to building the site! Monica Cellio‭ 8 months ago

+2
−0

Target audience: explorers and experimenters

A vibrant community around cooking will involve a lot of exploration and experimentation -- we're mostly going to be avid amateurs who are doing, or trying to do, great things in our kitchens at home. Sure, if restaurant chefs join us we'll welcome them too, but by sheer numbers they're going to be a small minority. Lots of people cook, and want to do more than the same old stuff they already know how to do. These people are our target audience.

For folks like I'm describing, pure Q&A isn't the sweet spot. We have questions (sometimes many questions), we're happy to answer questions -- but a lot of the time we're going to want to share stuff we've learned, talk about experiments (including failed ones), develop new recipes, talk about those adaptations we made because two months into the pandemic we still can't get bread flour, sesame oil, and plum tomatoes... So, we need a place to share knowledge that's first-class, alongside Q&A. It's kind of a blog, but "blog" might imply something more formal. Call it something like "Cooks' Notebooks". Let everybody share stuff there. When general-interest questions arise from those posts, ask them in Q&A (not in long comment threads). When Q&A inspires you to do something interesting, maybe you'll share it in the Notebooks. The two categories feed each other.

Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

3 comments

"The two categories feed each other." Compare: the writing challenges over on Writing (both SE and Codidact) which have sometimes prompted questions being asked on the main site. Canina‭ 8 months ago

Also, I see what you did there with "feed" in the context of a cooking site... :-) Canina‭ 8 months ago

I think a place to show off creations would be important as well. I'm not sure if this would be best included in Cook's Notes, or if a separate "Brags" category would be more appropriate. Sigma‭ 8 months ago

+2
−0

The comments indicate that we have a few people here who would be interested in participating. I think current events could make this a timely site -- more people are cooking more at home than previously and probably have questions. (I know I do, even though I'm an experienced cook.)

To move forward, we need to:

  • Determine that we do have people who will actively participate. How many? I don't know what a reasonable threshold is, but so far it appears we have too few for our newest site to gain momentum (though I do hope that changes!).

  • Establish scope. We don't need a detailed "on-topic/off-topic" list if we have some good overall guidelines, but we need at least the brief description, the bite-sized site description. What should that be?

  • Decide if this is a fresh start or if we'll be importing any data from SE and, if the latter, what.

Please use other answers to expand on these topics (one per answer, please). Doing this will allow us to use voting to determine where we have consensus.

Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comments

+1
−0

Launched

Cooking is now launched. Go forth and question!

Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comments

Sign up to answer this question »

This community is part of the Codidact network. We have other communities too — take a look!

You can also join us in chat!

Want to advertise this community? Use our templates!