Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Let us have a transparent review system.
According to the answers provided by the community staff to this post, I conclude that one of the Codidact policies is empowering moderators to take some required actions in some situations and allowing users to request the community team or a "Review Panel" to review the token actions.
However, such a review system may not satisfy skeptic users because they may think that the community team and the review panel are friends of some moderators and no fair action will be taken against them (Such a belief exists among some SE users).
In order to have a transparent review system without any possible suspicion, I want to suggest that any suspended user be allowed to bring their issue up on Meta.Codidact together with the following additional condition:
- All details concerned with the suspension will be provided in the meta post in case the suspended user approves publicly that their related private information is allowed to be provided publicly.
Some advantages of this feature are mentioned:
Codidact can be distinguished by its transparent review system from other platforms like SE.
Codidact users will become optimistic about fairness of actions token by moderators and staff.
Since all details can be shown to all, moderators, the community team, and the review panel will try to do their best and no privilege abuse from the authorities will be unlikely to be happen.