Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Requests to improve the contests

+3
−0

There are a couple of things that I think would be nice to improve contests,

  • Hide the score while the contest is ongoing, that way it doesn't influence other people's votes.
  • Sort answers in two ways, random by default and then by lastest entry, as it is currently set up it's slanted towards the earliest entries as they will get more votes to start with and then be higher on the page.
  • Disallow downvotes, upvotes are enough to determine winners, and downvotes can hurt people's feelings.
  • Some way or marking winners, used to be done by accepting the top answer after the contest was over.
History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

2 answers

+3
−0

These are all things that would be great to do, and they're all planned in some form, down the line. It won't be immediate; there's a bunch of other more critical features that need to be done first before we can look at a specific Contest post type that does this sort of thing.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

+2
−0

When it comes to Q&A in general, I am very much against:

Disallow downvotes, upvotes are enough to determine winners, and downvotes can hurt people's feelings.

as that turns the whole world into touchy-feely-everyone-is-wonderful, which, unfortunately, is not the case, and basically to me seems very fake and, in the end, counter-productive.

That being said, contests are not about "is this a good vs. great vs. possible-even-bad" answer, but rather ranking of preference. Much like voting in an election. And just as Robert's Rules of Order normally allows For/Against motions in general but for elections only allows positive votes (so if there is only one candidate, one vote is all you need to win - nobody can vote "against", whereas if there are multiple candidates, a majority (or other specified amount) is needed to win), doing the same here actually does make sense.

As far as:

Some way or marking winners, used to be done by accepting the top answer after the contest was over.

that is an interesting idea. Specifically for contests, more than just "one" winner makes sense. The simplest solution is just to rank by score and freeze voting at the end of the contest. Then the natural score-based ranking takes care of everything.

For the implementation, I think this could be simplified to Category-specific settings to:

  • Allow Upvotes only (vs. default Upvote/Downvote), though should allow someone to un-Upvote.
  • Freeze all voting, either at a preset time or an action by OP or by a moderator.
History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »