Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for qohelet
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #285576 |
I only recently learned about this post from Discord. This is a great idea! (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #285741 |
They are still missing for me on Apple iOS 15.3.1 and it doesn't seem to matter what browser I use (tested Safari, Chrome, and Firefox on mobile). (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278946 |
Consider expanding this broader to Information Security, which includes these areas but has additional areas. How we, if more interested in the legal and regulatory aspects, perhaps consider a Law site since this is just one area of law. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278967 |
I did it again two more times. See steps to duplicate: https://meta.codidact.com/a/278967/278977 (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278977 |
BTW the last sentence is hyperlinked. Bug duplicated again even in this post. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278976 |
I can do this pretty consistently now (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278970 |
It’s weird for sure (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278969 |
Here @Monica (let me know if this is not what you meant): https://meta.codidact.com/a/278967/278975 (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278969 |
Same bug shown above (don’t edit!) (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278967 |
I managed to do it again: https://meta.codidact.com/a/278967/278969 (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278765 |
Thanks, ghost-in-the-zsh, Bit Chaser, and TRiG! Added. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278840 |
Here’s an actual example of a good question for this site: https://software.codidact.com/q/278899 (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278884 |
That’s why I think a Christianity site with a different approach will work better based on my experience with the users such sites attract. With that said, I still participate on BH.SE and this is not a drop-in replacement by any means. These would be distinct communities with their own emphases. But... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278884 |
BTW for reference on this idea/approach, see https://hermeneutics.meta.stackexchange.com/a/886/ only this site would allow any combination of those modes. The reality is that hermeneutics are inherently theological, which is something BH.SE tries to bracket (rather unsuccessfully in my opinion—and th... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278884 |
This is up for discussion and I have a Google Doc I can share with you with more info if you email me at dan _at_ my Codidact username _dot_ com. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278884 |
Great questions, curiousdannii (and hello!). The proposal I’ve made, which isn’t currently shown, is to have some set of required tags to indicate the “domain(s)” of each question (which, for textual questions, would indicate which “modes of discourse” the OP is seeking to hear from, including theolo... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278764 |
@Nathaniel some of the conversation is in DMs on Twitter, and there is a collaborative document on Google Docs I've shared with some folks and would love to share with you (I actually wanted to share with you weeks ago but could not find your email address through your SE profile unfortunately). Plea... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278765 |
Thanks @Nathaniel (and good to hear from you!). :) (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278833 |
+1 for Power User. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278764 |
Well said, @Mithrandir24601. I am also “hesitant to define the scope of a site before we have a real community to say what they do and don't want.” (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278764 |
On this site, I suspect that would be off topic, but I'd rather let the community discuss _why_ it's off topic and such on meta than declare anything by fiat during this early phase haha (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278764 |
@Lundin we'll have to consider that. Currently Christianity.SE and Hermeneutics.SE somewhat subdivide topics related to the biblical texts. The former requires a specific question and it must specify a perspective it wants an answer from, and the latter requires questions to start from a specific tex... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278765 |
Thanks, @mbomb007, added. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278770 |
No worries! Thanks for the update! (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278770 |
Thanks for the update, Monica! (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278765 |
Thanks Sigma! I added you to the post. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277948 |
I [posted this related question](https://meta.codidact.com/q/278770) (before I realized this exists) which now contains an explicit link to this. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278764 |
There are also areas the community will need to discuss early on as to how to handle, such as how to handle philosophical questions asking about "the Truth" (e.g., "is X a sin?"), questions about the boundaries of Christianity itself (e.g., "who's in or out?"). In the past, other communities tend to ... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278764 |
With that said, some stuff we've discussed as clearly being off topic would be questions seeking personalized pastoral advice or counseling, answers from perspectives that can't be independently verified or falsified (e.g., "God revealed to me that the locusts are alien spaceships and that this will ... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278764 |
Good questions, Peter. I've included a broad summary of what would be on topic in the above post, but haven't elaborated much on what would be off topic because I think that will be hashed out more by the community. I also have come to "see the light" on a moderation philosophy that focuses on findin... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278765 |
Thanks, Mithrandir24601! I've added you to the post. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278764 |
Peter, that's a great point and definitely something we'd need to further consider (including making the language more agreeable and accessible). I went ahead and removed the stuff about tags so as to not "muddy the waters" of the proposal itself. All of this kind of stuff is best discussed in meta o... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278765 |
Thanks for expressing your interest, Peter! I've added you to the post. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |