Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Activity for Monica Cellio
Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Comment | Post #291158 |
Cross-category duplicates work within the same community, *so long as* they are both questions. (You can't currently close a question as a duplicate of an article, which is occasionally a problem but we haven't gotten to it yet.) (more) |
— | 2 days ago |
Comment | Post #290455 |
I filed a [GitHub issue](https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/1277) for reparenting a comment thread, which would partially address this. (You could then move the comment threads from the about-to-be-deleted answer, where "you" probably means a curator or moderator, TBD.) (more) |
— | 14 days ago |
Comment | Post #291030 |
Yeah, I know you found the solution, but the screenshot is for the next person who has this question. :-) (more) |
— | 17 days ago |
Comment | Post #291028 |
How is what we do now different from Karl's suggestion? (Ignoring the profile tab that Karl acknowledges would be a separate matter.) The links do link to the user-specific pages. Karl's answer describes link text rather than a button -- is that what you're asking for?
I marked it as declined b... (more) |
— | 17 days ago |
Comment | Post #291029 |
I didn't mean *that* abuse vector; I meant a different one where somebody tries to flood us (DOS). If that becomes an issue, we would look at rate limits.
Do you know how to make the modal aware of previous flags without a refresh, with our current architecture? (I don't, but there are lots of t... (more) |
— | 17 days ago |
Comment | Post #291001 |
Good catch! Not positional; added a test case. (more) |
— | 21 days ago |
Comment | Post #290389 |
The bouncing "saved" marker has been fixed. Thanks Oleg! (more) |
— | 29 days ago |
Comment | Post #290956 |
That's odd. I [temporarily trusted codidact.com](https://meta.codidact.com/uploads/8kytx244x8q99o39i9lpcqkrob9b) and refreshed, and `codiact.org` didn't show up for me. I did this in Firefox, in case that matters. I'm glad to hear that .org JS isn't required, though! (more) |
— | 30 days ago |
Comment | Post #290941 |
It's a little unclear what you're asking or suggesting here. This is probably something better discussed informally in chat, with individual suggestions or feature requests as separate Meta questions. (more) |
— | about 1 month ago |
Comment | Post #290951 |
I don't think that's intentional, no. Thanks for the report. (more) |
— | about 1 month ago |
Comment | Post #290947 |
I marked this as a duplicate of a bug about the same problem in comment threads, because I believe the root cause is the same. (more) |
— | about 1 month ago |
Comment | Post #290924 |
That's a good idea, thanks. (more) |
— | about 1 month ago |
Comment | Post #290922 |
Duplicate, but currently we can't close a question in one category as a dupe of an article in another. Working on that, but in the meantime I'll leave a placeholder answer to point the way. (more) |
— | about 1 month ago |
Comment | Post #290917 |
I don't have time for a proper answer right now (nor can I fully answer), but one link: [Co-Design framework](https://github.com/codidact/co-design). (more) |
— | about 1 month ago |
Comment | Post #290917 |
I think it's ok to have a general question here about the software platform. If people were asking lots of details we'd take it to Collab, but Meta is sort of the "commons" for our network. (more) |
— | about 1 month ago |
Comment | Post #290867 |
I agree that's confusing. I submitted a pull request to fix it. (more) |
— | about 1 month ago |
Comment | Post #290860 |
I've updated that GitHub issue with a link here. Thanks for finding that, @#53890. (more) |
— | about 1 month ago |
Comment | Post #290860 |
Validating length after stripping unsupported HTML seems like a good idea to me. In contexts where the minimum length is longer, this would look like a post (not a blank page) and people would want to know why the length wasn't enforced. (more) |
— | about 1 month ago |
Comment | Post #290855 |
Hi meta guy, and I'm sorry about the experience you had when you were just trying to help. We'll get this figured out somehow -- I don't want that to drag you down either. (more) |
— | about 1 month ago |
Comment | Post #290833 |
Looks like a bug to me, yes. Thanks for the report. (more) |
— | about 1 month ago |
Comment | Post #290764 |
Maybe a filter option for "my favorite tags"? You can filter on tags now, but you have to maintain that manually and we already have the concept of favorite tags, so maybe we can build on that? (more) |
— | about 1 month ago |
Comment | Post #290699 |
I'll have to defer to the developers for a more detailed answer, but I believe we are using third-party libraries for Markdown support, not rolling our own. (more) |
— | about 2 months ago |
Comment | Post #283318 |
Would you be interested in making this proposal on our new [proposals site](https://proposals.codidact.com/help/proposals), where people can also start asking and answering questions right away to test out the idea? From the votes it looks like this proposal has a lot of merit; are you still interes... (more) |
— | about 2 months ago |
Comment | Post #290650 |
And if your community doesn't have a place for articles and you would like it to, raise it on the per-community meta. (more) |
— | 2 months ago |
Comment | Post #290623 |
I wouldn't worry about that, Michael. The questions were unclear and the author didn't respond to requests for improvement, so they were eventually deleted. They weren't off-topic and new questions are welcome. (more) |
— | 2 months ago |
Comment | Post #289738 |
I can't reproduce this. Are you still seeing this behavior? (more) |
— | 2 months ago |
Comment | Post #289600 |
Hmm, this got fixed back when you asked the question, but something seems to have held up deploying it. I'm looking into it. (more) |
— | 3 months ago |
Comment | Post #290495 |
I've been seeing more of this lately too, and as an admin I can see everything. I've raised it internally -- don't know if it's a code bug or something wonky with the redis cache. (more) |
— | 3 months ago |
Comment | Post #290471 |
For anyone who's wondering, this isn't "jumping the line" because the request came from a staff member; it's status-planned because I think I actually know enough to be able to _fix_ this one without bothering the real developers much. And because the lack of visibility has been a source of frustrat... (more) |
— | 3 months ago |
Comment | Post #290455 |
Not currently possible. (Well, someone with direct DB access can do anything, but that's not what we're talking about here. :-) ) "Reparent a comment thread" seems like a useful thing to add and _probably_ not too hard. Converting types probably requires more work. (more) |
— | 3 months ago |
Comment | Post #290441 |
> But why? The help center already has topics unique to each community. I'm not following along here.
Sorry -- let me try again. Each community can "fork" help topics to locally customize them, and can also add new topics. EE, for example, has done significant rearranging of their help. That's ... (more) |
— | 3 months ago |
Comment | Post #289387 |
Status-overcome-by-events, actually -- that flag is now gone, so the problems with its comment prompt are too. Comment preview (in general) is being tracked separately. (more) |
— | 3 months ago |
Comment | Post #289337 |
I suspect it has something to do with the content of the comments -- specifically, either the code blocks or the URL making the comment wide and that somehow affecting the post. Or maybe I'm completely wrong -- the challenge of insufficient data points so far. (more) |
— | 3 months ago |
Comment | Post #290418 |
An inbox notification, triggered by some threshold (N days, after first interaction on the site, etc) could be another approach -- doesn't get in your way like a popup but still asks for attention. (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
Comment | Post #289351 |
How is your workaround working out? I had one further idea: we can make the "do-not-use" tags moderator-only, which would block people using the synonyms and not just warn them about it. I currently see one use of one of these tags. (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
Comment | Post #290389 |
Collecting first impressions is something I very much want us to do; it's easy for us experienced users to become acclimated to something that's posing an entry barrier and not realize it. This is Meta, and I'm not overly concerned with what form this takes. The important thing is to learn about us... (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
Comment | Post #290389 |
Thank you. This is very helpful! (I'll try to have more specific responses later. :-) ) (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
Comment | Post #290315 |
Oh, thanks for catching that. Close behaves like flag, FYI. Maybe we should just give everything of this sort an "X" in addition to whatever other things work, because that's a clear signal. Hmm. (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
Comment | Post #290315 |
This is true for all the modals -- inbox, search, flag, close, react... they're toggles. (Well, almost all -- moderators have a "tools" option that behaves differently, and there might be some others, but in general, if you clicked to open it and you don't see an X, click again to close it.) (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
Comment | Post #290312 |
We could show the +/- scores in the tooltip for "N votes" -- flipping the primacy of votes vs score but keeping both available. (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
Comment | Post #290299 |
Probably a display-only bug. The "you can't review this" notice incorrectly appears, but so do the buttons. It looks like you can in fact approve edits to your own posts even if you can't approve others. We're looking into this. (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
Comment | Post #290299 |
I agree and thought post owners could. Sounds like a bug to me; thanks for reporting. (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
Comment | Post #290268 |
We have some pending changes to help with redaction, including rollback. There's also a proposal (I don't recall where this stands) to raise an auto-flag for redactions. If those aren't enough, we can add more restrictions. On the one hand we want to get things like API keys off of the public site... (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
Comment | Post #279613 |
I'm using an old post that I don't think anybody is following to do science. Sorry for any errant pings if I was wrong about that. @trichoplax did this ping you? If so, please let me know on [this post](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/288700/290271#answer-290271). (more) |
— | 4 months ago |
Comment | Post #290192 |
Whoops, I thought we blocked repeats of the same flag. Guess not! (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
Comment | Post #290079 |
Redirecting to the dashboard view for logged-in users is a good idea. Logged-in users already know what Codidact is, so they don't need the explanations that are on the static landing page. For first-time visitors we do want to show more than just a list of sites and their categories. It would be ... (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
Comment | Post #290067 |
Here's the PR, in case anyone's interested in what the short-term change is: https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/pull/1220 . (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
Comment | Post #290048 |
No patience required! Feedback on what isn't clear enough helps us improve. It can be hard sometimes when you're immersed in a system to notice that we're making assumptions. (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
Comment | Post #290048 |
I opened a PR to add some better hints here. Thanks for raising the question. (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
Comment | Post #288102 |
Good idea -- thanks for the suggestion!
(more) |
— | 5 months ago |