Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on Don't show "Initial revision" in user activity

Post

Don't show "Initial revision" in user activity [duplicate]

+3
−1

Closed as duplicate by Monica Cellio‭ on Feb 15, 2023 at 15:17

This question has been addressed elsewhere. See: Hiding "Initial revision" on the Edits section of the Activity tab of the user profile

This question was closed; new answers can no longer be added. Users with the reopen privilege may vote to reopen this question if it has been improved or closed incorrectly.

Immediately after the activity entry about posting a question or answer, another entry labeled "Initial revision" is placed. This seems kind of redundant to me, since all it really says is that a post was created, which can be seen from the previous entry. The only current use for it is to provide a link to the created post, since for some reason the created-a-post activity entry doesn't have one (it should).

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

2 comment threads

About the duplicate... (1 comment)
General comments (4 comments)
General comments
Moshi‭ wrote about 4 years ago

@ploni Sure, it makes sense from a technical standpoint, but from a UI standpoint I feel it's unnecessary.

pnuts‭ wrote about 4 years ago · edited about 4 years ago

Current status seems harmless to me and given how much else seems to deserve priority, I'm down voting in the hope that that reduces attention here in favour of attention elsewhere, for the moment. Here similar.

Moshi‭ wrote about 4 years ago

@pnuts really? downvoting just because "it's not important"? Important stuff will be upvoted more anyway.