Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the "town hall" (meta-discussion site) for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on Allow a question to exist in multiple communities.

Post

Allow a question to exist in multiple communities.

+0
−2

Occasionally, a post is a brilliant fit for multiple communities. Questions at Linux and Power Users are the most pertinent example, [1] but the decision to not create one for AOSP is, too. [2]

Reddit remediates this with cross-posting, which applies other communities' topics as tags to a post that fundamentally lives within one of them. This is a workaround at best, but the current status quo of having posts be of a hierarchical nature is worse.

Meta's Instagram and Facebook recently implemented a solution to an equivalent problem of theirs, by allowing an post to have been posted by multiple accounts, treating none as the ultimate owner. Although, in this case, QPixel's problem isn't ownership, the problem of organisation is identical.

Treating the community designations like tags might mean a reduction in duplicate questions.


  1. powerusers.codidact.com/comments/thread/5126#comment-27710 ↩︎

  2. proposals.codidact.com/comments/thread/9530#comment-24591 ↩︎

History

1 comment thread

Very closely related (not sure if duplicate) (2 comments)
Very closely related (not sure if duplicate)
trichoplax‭ wrote 11 months ago

There was a previous suggestion of using something like tags to allow a question to be in more than one community, in Questions Displaying in more than one community?

There is some discussion in comments there, including a link to another related discussion How to refer members of community B to a question in community A which suits both communities?, which has an answer that seems very relevant to your question.

Mr. Beedell, Roke Julian Lockhart (RJLB)‭ wrote 11 months ago · edited 11 months ago

trichoplax‭, thanks. Certainly, posts/283073/history#1 is relevant, 1 whereas posts/283096/history#1 proposes too specific of an implementation to be very actionable:

Communities remain focused this way but certain grey zone questions could then show up in 2 or more locations (if applicable).

  1. comments/thread/11169#comment-27662