Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on Randomize order of answers with same score

Parent

Randomize order of answers with same score

+5
−0

Answers are shown in order according to their score derived from their votes. However, for answers with the same score, they seem to be shown in chronological order of creation time. This tends to "feature" earlier answers higher than later answers, even if the later answers have been rated the same by the community.

It would be better if the display order of answers with the same score were randomized. Or perhaps a small random amount is added to the score of all answers for the purpose of sorting them. That might cause slightly lower rated answers to occasionally be featured above other answers.

The purpose of featuring answers on average according to their score only, not creation date, is so that votes become more representative of their quality. It was pretty clear from another Q&A site that upvotes on good answers were influenced by how they were featured.

This is not a high priority, but I would like it to at least be on the eventual plan.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

Post
+7
−0

Since it's easy: yes, done - going live in the next build.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

General comments (3 comments)
General comments
pnuts‭ wrote about 4 years ago

Does MVP remain "We order answers by score, with newer answers winning ties." ?

Olin Lathrop‭ wrote about 4 years ago

@pnuts: That would be favoring newer answers. The system should strive to not add bias to the voting.

pnuts‭ wrote about 4 years ago

@OlinLathrop Agreed. Mild concern is a common "ideal", which both implementations strive for (that's @luap42 20200707 on Discord about C# and Qpixel), and MVP was (s/h been?) consensus, whereas above looks unilateral.