Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the "town hall" (meta-discussion site) for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on Meaningful message when failing to close a post as a duplicate of a different type

Post

Meaningful message when failing to close a post as a duplicate of a different type

+3
−0

If I try to close a question as a duplicate of a different post type, such as a blog, this correctly fails. However, there is no message indicating the reason for the failure, so someone might not realise that this is not a valid duplicate target. All that is displayed is "Failed: 404" in a red box:

A red box floating above the Close post dialog saying "Failed: 404"

Could a meaningful message be displayed instead so that people can understand why it fails and know not to keep trying again?

History

1 comment thread

Should we actually reject this? (2 comments)
Should we actually reject this?
Karl Knechtel‭ wrote about 2 months ago

I can imagine situations where something was posted in the wrong section but is also a duplicate. In the future, communities could possibly grow to where the right section for a question is unclear (or depends on how it's phrased), or the actual question is a bit vague etc. but it turns out that the underlying concern really is best addressed by established Q&A in a different section.

Perhaps this kind of duplicate closure would more often be attempted by mistake, but it's also a bit hard to imagine how it happens by mistake.

trichoplax‭ wrote about 2 months ago

Yes longer term it might be possible to close a post as a duplicate of a post of a different type. I don't believe there's a feature request for that yet. This request is just for clarity in the meantime.