Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on I suggest to better format the title ("summarize your post with a title") area

Parent

I suggest to better format the title ("summarize your post with a title") area

+3
−4

By some odd mistake I wrote only about half a title to a post in Scientific Speculation yesterday:

The post stayed like this for many hours and two down votes came; unsurprisingly with down votes, no comment such as "I recon the title is broken" was left (and I find it plausible to think that the broken title caused to bias the reader just right on start).

I quite like the idea that titles are under post bodies in post edit pages but I think that the title area should be less "buried" between the post body and the tags area, should get some more special CSS and perhaps even get some minimal length; either way, automatic transfer to a preview page of a post (as happens in StackExchange, which is something I myself proposed there at the time) might be better than anything else.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

Minimal length is already a thing (1 comment)
Show more
Post
+1
−2

There is nothing broken here, and nothing to fix or change.

Anyone can make a typo, forget to finish the title, or delete a piece of it by accident. That wasn't the problem.

The real problem was that you obviously didn't look over the post after submitting it. Even the most minimal proofreading would have caught the broken title.

This is squarely on you.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

2 comment threads

``` Anyone can make a typo, forget to finish the title, or delete a piece of it by accident. That wa... (2 comments)
I have published around 200 posts in the website and I don't recall ever not finishing the title. ... (1 comment)
``` Anyone can make a typo, forget to finish the title, or delete a piece of it by accident. That wa...
deleted user wrote about 3 years ago
Anyone can make a typo, forget to finish the title, or delete a piece of it by accident. That wasn't the problem.

The real problem was that you obviously didn't look over the post after submitting it.

why do you assume that this "real problem" cannot happen by mistake just as the other mistakes you have mentioned ?!

deleted user wrote about 3 years ago

Use > instead of codeblocks for replying to a piece of texts.