Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on Add an option to retract a flag before it's handled

Parent

Add an option to retract a flag before it's handled

+11
−0

I was reviewing a post when mistakenly, I flagged the post. I wanted to remove that flag, since I know that moderators would decline it.

Since the flag was raised by mistake, it would be great if the flag could be retracted before it's handled.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

Post
+2
−1

I agree, we know from experience that this is useful. "Someplace Else" got this feature and I've used it now and then. Often when you get some "wait a minute..." moment, realizing that you have misinterpreted something. Or when an OP changes the question with clarifications so that it makes better sense.

This feature would reduce moderator workload and improve quality of flags raised.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

Useful but maybe not very high priority (3 comments)
Useful but maybe not very high priority
Trilarion‭ wrote almost 3 years ago

It's certainly useful, but then a declined flag isn't a big thing either and this feature would be hopefully needed in only a small number of cases. It can probably be low priority.

It actually can be a big thing. Currently, the requirements for obtaining abilities such as the curator ability, are quite high. One declined flag can make a difference.

I'd like to put forth an example: just now, I flagged one of my own posts to request a tag merge (can't think of a better way to suggest tag merges that is possible with today's tools (except for in chat)). Only afterwards, I realized that one of the tags I requested to merge with the other one, was created by me when I made this post, and that it's the only instance of this tag being used (I missed that when creating the post 5 minutes earlier). If I already had the curation ability, I'd have noticed this on the tag merge page. Even then, it wouldn't have been a problem anyway. So even if I'd made the exact same error with the ability (making errors is bad, but inevitable), the consequences wouldn't have been bad in any way. In fact, they'd have been better than when flagging was my only option.

Quoting myself:

(can't think of a better way to suggest tag merges that is possible with today's tools (except for in chat))

Well, creating a post on meta, is another option, but I prefer to avoid it for really trivial cases that are obviously trivial beyond any reasonable doubt.