Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Comments on Could we adopt the domain “.cd”?

Post

Could we adopt the domain “.cd”?

+2
−4

How would people feel about a network-wide convention of abbreviated URLs having the form, https://<topic>.cd?

For example, a shortened URL for a philosophy site would be https://philosophy.cd, along with the full URL of https://philosophy.codidact.com. (Or, maybe even shorter, https://phil.cd, or something.)

Why?

  • It’s a user-friendly, modern software design.
  • It’s efficient to link to and refer to sites in the network, that way.
  • It’s potentially more compact and memorable, even a type of “branding”.

A number of other sites do this, for example, YouTube with “youtu.be/” style links, I think.

Let me know your thoughts.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

3 comment threads

Having each community on a different domain would probably also cause a lot of headaches for a common... (1 comment)
Not analogous (1 comment)
Cute but expensive (1 comment)
Cute but expensive
Michael‭ wrote 10 months ago

I like the idea, but Mithical's point is important. Even the millions of dollars in the SE network haven't resulted in a .se for each of their communities.