Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Review the reviews, show other users' feedback, filter reviewable items by tags

+0
−1

3 points in this proposal:

  • Allow users to review other users' reviews;
  • Display information about reviews on your reviews by others;
  • Allow reviewers to opt out of certain tags if they are not confident in reviewing them.

It should be possible to review other users' completed reviews and subsequently show this data to the original reviewers for their information - which kinds of content they seem to be reviewing correctly or incorrectly according to their peers.

If someone makes a number of bad reviews, and are eligible for a temporary review ban, they should know exactly what led to that, so that they can learn from their mistakes and choose how to proceed. For example:

  • Learn more about how to review and not make the same mistakes again;
  • If the problem is about an area of expertise that the user doesn't know enough about, propose the user to
    • Temporarily opt out of reviewing content with relevant tags, and every month ask them again if they would like to re-enable those tags, if they feel like they've learned enough to be able to do a better job at reviewing them than before.
    • Or just keep them filtered indefinitely if it's something the user has no way or intention of learning/reviewing.
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

General comments (2 comments)

1 answer

+1
−0

These may well all be things we do when reviews are implemented. At the moment, reviews don't exist, so I'm marking this [status-deferred].

Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »