Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Post History
Article 22 says that all decisions are to be published, exclusive of summary judgments. I think it should specify that the decisions be published with reasons included, and inclusive of summary jud...
Answer
#2: Post edited
by
msh210
·
2020-07-08T06:51:00Z (over 4 years ago)
a bit more
Article 22 says that all decisions are to be published, exclusive of summary judgments. I think it should specify that the decisions be published _with reasons included_, and inclusive of summary judgments (though those may not have reasons stated). The more transparency into the workings of the panel, the more trust people will have in it.
- Article 22 says that all decisions are to be published, exclusive of summary judgments. I think it should specify that the decisions be published _with reasons included_, and inclusive of summary judgments (though those may not have reasons stated). The more transparency into the workings of the panel, the more trust people will have in it. For a summary judgment in particular, I don't like that it can have been noticed by only two panel members, has no appeal, and has no publication.
#1: Initial revision
by
msh210
·
2020-07-07T22:08:02Z (over 4 years ago)
Article 22 says that all decisions are to be published, exclusive of summary judgments. I think it should specify that the decisions be published _with reasons included_, and inclusive of summary judgments (though those may not have reasons stated). The more transparency into the workings of the panel, the more trust people will have in it.