Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Post History

45%
+3 −4
Q&A Is gaining rep based on SE content ok?

Is it a problem if specific users harvest highly-voted questions on SE, then self answer, to farm a huge amount of rep? Eh, maybe, but it's not important enough to spend much time thinking about. ...

posted 4y ago by Olin Lathrop‭

Answer
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Olin Lathrop‭ · 2020-07-19T16:33:04Z (over 4 years ago)
<blockquote>Is it a problem if specific users harvest highly-voted questions on SE, then self answer, to farm a huge amount of rep?</blockquote>

Eh, maybe, but it's not important enough to spend much time thinking about.  If they actually add new content here, then I don't see a problem with it.  

Ideally, rep here only comes from activity here, not from imported data.  I can see how that might be difficult to implement, though.  When importing a question, you probably want to preserve the votes on the answers that show which ones are good and which ones bad.  It doesn't seem worth extra code and bookkeeping to treat imported votes differently.

The much bigger problem is all those posts from long ago showing up here.  I remember seeing a new question on Photography or Scientific Speculation here, reading a couple of pages, then realizing down the bottom that this was asked and answered 3 years ago.  Argh!  Thanks for the wasted of time.  I've been downvoting such imported questions ever since.