Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Post History

66%
+2 −0
Q&A Second Iteration of Drafting the Codidact Arbitration & Review Panel

A few things re. conducting Panel business: I propose codifying the number required for quorum, with "quorum" in this case meaning the number of Panel members required to be present in order to c...

posted 4y ago by ShowMeBillyJo‭  ·  edited 4y ago by ShowMeBillyJo‭

Answer
#2: Post edited by user avatar ShowMeBillyJo‭ · 2020-08-31T18:19:24Z (about 4 years ago)
Clarification of points
  • > The Panel consists of 7 members…
  • > …⅔ of the panel
  • > …⅔ majority…
  • I propose codifying the number required for quorum.
  • A few things re. conducting Panel business:
  • 1. I propose codifying the number required for quorum, with "quorum" in this case meaning the number of Panel members required to be present in order to conduct business.
  • a. Do quorum rules apply to offline/asynchronous votes (such as in a Codidact post), or only to live meetings of the Panel?
  • 2. The two "⅔" rules are worded slightly differently and could therefore be interpreted differently. Is that intended?
  • a. **Article 16** could imply the entire Panel must vote, not just a quorum if present.
  • b. **Article 17** could imply only a quorum is needed to vote.
#1: Initial revision by user avatar ShowMeBillyJo‭ · 2020-08-31T04:25:55Z (about 4 years ago)
> The Panel consists of 7 members…  
> …⅔ of the panel…  
> …⅔ majority…

I propose codifying the number required for quorum.