Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Post History

71%
+3 −0
Q&A Suggested edits don't show meaningful diff

I've seen the board assessing this problem as a high priority issue. Somewhere it's marked as medium priority, but that's not entirely true (in case someone has read). I could guess that this would...

posted 4y ago by .                                                .‭  ·  edited 4y ago by .                                                .‭

Answer
#5: Post edited by user avatar .                                                .‭ · 2020-09-10T09:11:25Z (about 4 years ago)
abandoned qpixel development until I can make sense out of its ORM
  • I've seen the board assessing this problem as a high priority issue. Somewhere it's marked as medium priority, but that's not entirely true (in case someone has read).
  • I could guess that this would be almost completely tackled in a matter of from several weeks to a few months.
  • Meanwhile I'm working on it too, since a few days ago, a little in advance, see if I can finish before them.
  • It seemed curious to me that there was no answer, so to let people know several heads are on this.
  • I've seen the board assessing this problem as a high priority issue. Somewhere it's marked as medium priority, but that's not entirely true (in case someone has read).
  • I could guess that this would be almost completely tackled in a matter of from several weeks to a few months.
  • ~~Meanwhile I'm working on it too, since a few days ago, a little in advance, see if I can finish before them.~~
  • It seemed curious to me that there was no answer, so to let people know several heads are on this.
#4: Post edited by user avatar .                                                .‭ · 2020-09-05T21:31:08Z (about 4 years ago)
my scope is now increased so revamp this entirely
  • I have [~~a fix~~ a humble minor improvement][0] for this, but I'm somewhat scared of breaking something. If it doesn't get fixed I will eventually get confident and open PR.
  • <sub>BTW any GitHub user can open the PR on my behalf if fool enough to trust me. 😈</sub>
  • NOTE: A 100% satisfactory fix for both 'reviewing edits' and 'browsing edits history' seems a little away from here. But I've seen the board assessing this problem as a high priority issue. It seemed curious to me that there was no answer, so to let people know several heads are on this and to point the corresponding development team members to torture my proposed change.
  • [0]: https://github.com/galegosimpatico/qpixel/commit/976872d64a46ea0b889dbca9b11adb050adc5d00
  • I've seen the board assessing this problem as a high priority issue. Somewhere it's marked as medium priority, but that's not entirely true (in case someone has read).
  • I could guess that this would be almost completely tackled in a matter of from several weeks to a few months.
  • Meanwhile I'm working on it too, since a few days ago, a little in advance, see if I can finish before them.
  • It seemed curious to me that there was no answer, so to let people know several heads are on this.
#3: Post edited by user avatar .                                                .‭ · 2020-09-03T16:50:03Z (about 4 years ago)
  • I have [~~a fix~~ a humble minor improvement][0] for this, but I'm somewhat scared of breaking something. If it doesn't get fixed I will eventually get confident and open PR.
  • <sub>BTW any GitHub user can open the PR on my behalf if fool enough to trust me. 😈</sub>
  • [0]: https://github.com/galegosimpatico/qpixel/commit/976872d64a46ea0b889dbca9b11adb050adc5d00
  • I have [~~a fix~~ a humble minor improvement][0] for this, but I'm somewhat scared of breaking something. If it doesn't get fixed I will eventually get confident and open PR.
  • <sub>BTW any GitHub user can open the PR on my behalf if fool enough to trust me. 😈</sub>
  • NOTE: A 100% satisfactory fix for both 'reviewing edits' and 'browsing edits history' seems a little away from here. But I've seen the board assessing this problem as a high priority issue. It seemed curious to me that there was no answer, so to let people know several heads are on this and to point the corresponding development team members to torture my proposed change.
  • [0]: https://github.com/galegosimpatico/qpixel/commit/976872d64a46ea0b889dbca9b11adb050adc5d00
#2: Post edited by user avatar .                                                .‭ · 2020-09-03T15:48:04Z (about 4 years ago)
well, a fix...
  • I have [a fix][0] for this, but I'm somewhat scared of breaking something. If it doesn't get fixed I will eventually get confident and open PR.
  • <sub>BTW any GitHub user can open the PR on my behalf if fool enough to trust me. 😈</sub>
  • [0]: https://github.com/galegosimpatico/qpixel/commit/976872d64a46ea0b889dbca9b11adb050adc5d00
  • I have [~~a fix~~ a humble minor improvement][0] for this, but I'm somewhat scared of breaking something. If it doesn't get fixed I will eventually get confident and open PR.
  • <sub>BTW any GitHub user can open the PR on my behalf if fool enough to trust me. 😈</sub>
  • [0]: https://github.com/galegosimpatico/qpixel/commit/976872d64a46ea0b889dbca9b11adb050adc5d00
#1: Initial revision by user avatar .                                                .‭ · 2020-09-03T15:46:57Z (about 4 years ago)
I have [a fix][0] for this, but I'm somewhat scared of breaking something. If it doesn't get fixed I will eventually get confident and open PR.

<sub>BTW any GitHub user can open the PR on my behalf if fool enough to trust me. 😈</sub>

[0]: https://github.com/galegosimpatico/qpixel/commit/976872d64a46ea0b889dbca9b11adb050adc5d00