Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Post History

66%
+2 −0
Q&A Let us have a transparent review system.

In order to have a transparent review system without any possible suspicion, I want to suggest that any suspended user be allowed to bring their issue up on Meta.Codidact together with the followi...

posted 4y ago by FoggyFinder‭

Answer
#1: Initial revision by user avatar FoggyFinder‭ · 2020-09-26T18:58:50Z (about 4 years ago)
> In order to have a transparent review system without any possible suspicion, I want to suggest that any suspended user be allowed to bring their issue up on Meta.Codidact together with the following additional condition:

In fact it's not a suggestion. Idea? Maybe, but key details are missing. Ability to create Q won't help by itself. Someone still have to change status of suspended user.

How do you see an implementation? How are you going to separate those who are innocent from let's say trolls beforehand? (Spoiler: there is no way).

If one got suspension then, it means, they should not interact 
publicly within some time. With no exceptions. Private channels is a separate story. That's expected and that's right.

`Review Panel` seems like an optimal way to resolve conflicts. Small set of unbiased members whose duties is resolving exactly such situations. Perfect solution.

Besides, if user cannot trust anyone then why would they participate in a community at all ?

Again, in worst case member has a chance to bring attention through Meta after they suspension ends.