Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Post History

84%
+9 −0
Q&A Let us have a transparent review system.

Anyone who has been remotely close to any form of moderator position, or a leadership position in general, can tell you that all forms of disciplinary actions must be carried out privately. Nobody ...

posted 4y ago by Lundin‭

Answer
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Lundin‭ · 2020-09-26T23:03:29Z (about 4 years ago)
Anyone who has been remotely close to any form of moderator position, or a leadership position in general, can tell you that all forms of disciplinary actions _must_ be carried out privately. 

Nobody responds well to getting a temporary suspension or a warning. They will react far more negatively if this is handed out in front of an audience. 

It would be like putting out fire with gasoline; there will be a pie/dung throwing contest in no time. With a system like that one you propose, there will be constant drama, angst and moderator frustration.

If you have any doubt about this, go to Stack Overflow Meta and go read "why have I been banned" posts. The vast majority of them are not constructive and did not help anyone in any way, including the poster.

The review panel is a sound idea. It will consist of users, not of moderators/staff. In the case where moderators make mistakes or abuse their powers, it can be addressed by this panel, by reviewing cases in _private_.