Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Post History

60%
+1 −0
Q&A How should Codidact "advertise" and gain community members?

Re. “That said, Meta Stack Overflow does have at least one Q&A discussing alternatives to Stack Overflow. There is nothing wrong with ... editing an existing community-wiki answer to add a lin...

posted 4y ago by Logician‭

Answer
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Logician‭ · 2020-09-29T06:49:19Z (about 4 years ago)
Re. 
 > “That said, Meta Stack Overflow does have at least one Q&A discussing alternatives to Stack Overflow. There is nothing wrong with ... editing an existing community-wiki answer to add a link to Codidact”

IIRC: That post how I found my way here? But the top post is community-wiki but still needs that edit.  **Why? Fear? Let’s address that here:** I think it would be helpful for people to post here about SE reactions to **proper** forms of “advertising”.  I bet many fear SE taking unreasonable actions (given recent history). 

Maybe instead of an answer, this text should be a question: is SE reacting reasonably to **proper** forms of “advertising”