Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Post History
I disagree. I think the users involved in the vote should be the users who are already involved in Meta.CD or the meta of a given community site. Just like each community has its own set of convent...
Answer
#3: Post edited
by
ShowMeBillyJo
·
2020-09-29T16:47:05Z (about 4 years ago)
clarity
- I disagree. I think the users involved in the vote should be the users who are already involved in Meta.CD or the meta of a given community site. Just like each community has its own set of conventions, so does meta. I think it would be detrimental to meta conversations overall if we increase the noise by polling the community at large for every single thing. I counter-propose two ideas:
- 1. _Occasionally, manually_ (not automatically!) ask for broad community input on a meta topic. Leave it up to each community to decide when/how to do that.
2. Promote participation in meta _generally,_ with an educational onboarding process.
- I disagree. I think the users involved in the vote should be the users who are already involved in Meta.CD or the meta of a given community site. Just like each community has its own set of conventions, so does meta. I think it would be detrimental to meta conversations overall if we increase the noise by polling the community at large for every single thing. I counter-propose two ideas:
- 1. _Occasionally, manually_ (not automatically!) ask for broad community input on a meta topic. Leave it up to each community to decide when/how to do that.
- 2. Promote participation in meta _generally,_ with an educational onboarding process.
- (To be clear, this isn't a feature request by itself, but a counterproposal to OP to use existing functionality to do something similar to the request.)
#2: Post edited
by
ShowMeBillyJo
·
2020-09-29T16:27:55Z (about 4 years ago)
I disagree. I think the users who are involved in the vote should be the users who are already involved in Meta.CD or the meta of a given community site. Just like each community has its own set of conventions, so does meta. I think it would be detrimental to meta conversations overall if we increase the noise by polling the community at large for every single thing. I counter-propose two ideas:- 1. _Occasionally, manually_ (not automatically!) ask for broad community input on a meta topic. Leave it up to each community to decide when/how to do that.
- 2. Promote participation in meta _generally,_ with an educational onboarding process.
- I disagree. I think the users involved in the vote should be the users who are already involved in Meta.CD or the meta of a given community site. Just like each community has its own set of conventions, so does meta. I think it would be detrimental to meta conversations overall if we increase the noise by polling the community at large for every single thing. I counter-propose two ideas:
- 1. _Occasionally, manually_ (not automatically!) ask for broad community input on a meta topic. Leave it up to each community to decide when/how to do that.
- 2. Promote participation in meta _generally,_ with an educational onboarding process.
#1: Initial revision
by
ShowMeBillyJo
·
2020-09-29T16:27:06Z (about 4 years ago)
I disagree. I think the users who are involved in the vote should be the users who are already involved in Meta.CD or the meta of a given community site. Just like each community has its own set of conventions, so does meta. I think it would be detrimental to meta conversations overall if we increase the noise by polling the community at large for every single thing. I counter-propose two ideas: 1. _Occasionally, manually_ (not automatically!) ask for broad community input on a meta topic. Leave it up to each community to decide when/how to do that. 2. Promote participation in meta _generally,_ with an educational onboarding process.