Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Post History

77%
+5 −0
Q&A How to ensure that duplicating a post from another website won't cause content duplication that would hurt Codidact's SEO?

There are two aspects to copies, license/attribution and duplication. The CC-BY-SA license doesn't require you to include attribution links for your own work. This is why, on communities with imp...

posted 3y ago by Monica Cellio‭

Answer
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Monica Cellio‭ · 2021-03-31T13:07:58Z (over 3 years ago)
There are two aspects to copies, license/attribution and duplication.

The CC-BY-SA license doesn't require you to include attribution links for your own work.  This is why, on communities with imported content, we remove those attribution links when people claim their imported posts -- we no longer rely on or care about the SE license because the author has *directly* licensed that content to us.  Your case is complicated because you can't prove that user is you, but from a license perspective, I think it would be sufficient to say in your question here that you previously asked it there.  I don't think you need to link it.

Search engines don't like duplicate content.  It's better if you can *improve* the question when you post it here.  Your original question has comments that suggest ways you could improve the question -- things to clarify, etc.  Can you make the question that you post here *better* than the one you asked there, which also makes it not a strict duplicate?