Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Post History
There is some amount of subjectivity in evaluating proposals, which is not ideal. It's important for us (all, together) to figure out how we can improve our process. Ultimately we probably need t...
Answer
#1: Initial revision
by
Monica Cellio
·
2021-04-08T03:04:26Z (about 3 years ago)
There is some amount of subjectivity in evaluating proposals, which is not ideal. It's important for us (all, together) to figure out [how we can improve our process](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903). Ultimately we probably need to make some software changes to better support proposals, but right now we have those "indicate your interest" posts. We're caught between the goals of not creating ghost towns on the one hand and not holding back communities on the other. Suspicious voting does not help. Inflating a proposal's apparent support makes "ghost town" more likely, which harms everyone. I wish people would not do this. We are aware of some situations that call for scrutiny, and we're taking it into account. (Separately, that flag issue sounds like a bug, and I've asked someone with database access to look into what happened there. Thanks for the report.)