Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Post History

80%
+6 −0
Q&A What to do about sock puppets in Site Proposals?

There is some amount of subjectivity in evaluating proposals, which is not ideal. It's important for us (all, together) to figure out how we can improve our process. Ultimately we probably need t...

posted 3y ago by Monica Cellio‭

Answer
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Monica Cellio‭ · 2021-04-08T03:04:26Z (over 3 years ago)
There is some amount of subjectivity in evaluating proposals, which is not ideal.  It's important for us (all, together) to figure out [how we can improve our process](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279903).  Ultimately we probably need to make some software changes to better support proposals, but right now we have those "indicate your interest" posts.  We're caught between the goals of not creating ghost towns on the one hand and not holding back communities on the other.

Suspicious voting does not help.  Inflating a proposal's apparent support makes "ghost town" more likely, which harms everyone.  I wish people would not do this.

We are aware of some situations that call for scrutiny, and we're taking it into account.

(Separately, that flag issue sounds like a bug, and I've asked someone with database access to look into what happened there.  Thanks for the report.)