Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Post History
I agree with the notion that reputation numbers cause more harm than good, at least in general and at least in the long run. I was not convinced by any argument I have read so far to why its "sore...
Answer
#4: Post edited
- I agree with the notion that reputation numbers cause more harm than good, at least in general and at least in the long run.
- I was not convinced by any argument I have read so far to why its "sorely needed" here in Codidact.
People ask questions and give answers about fields of knowledge that they have want to acquire knowledge in / be grasped as understanding in, respectively; so if the main motivator for such operations was points, then Wikipedia articles and community websites (say, MediaWiki support desk), Drupal forums, etc., weren't so rich as they are with data given by volunteers.
- I agree with the notion that reputation numbers cause more harm than good, at least in general and at least in the long run.
- I was not convinced by any argument I have read so far to why its "sorely needed" here in Codidact.
- People ask questions and give answers about fields of knowledge that they have want to acquire knowledge in / be grasped as understanding in, respectively; so if the main motivator for such operations was points, then Wikipedia articles and community websites (say, MediaWiki support desk, Drupal forums, etc.), weren't so rich as they are with data given by volunteers.
#3: Post edited
- I agree with the notion that reputation numbers cause more harm than good, at least in general and at least in the long run.
- I was not convinced by any argument I have read so far to why its "sorely needed" here in Codidact.
People ask and answer in fields of knowledge that they have interest to understand in / be grasped as understanding in; if the main motivator was points, then Wikipedia articles and community websites (say, MediaWiki support desk), Drupal forums, etc., weren't so rich as they are with data given by volunteers.
- I agree with the notion that reputation numbers cause more harm than good, at least in general and at least in the long run.
- I was not convinced by any argument I have read so far to why its "sorely needed" here in Codidact.
- People ask questions and give answers about fields of knowledge that they have want to acquire knowledge in / be grasped as understanding in, respectively; so if the main motivator for such operations was points, then Wikipedia articles and community websites (say, MediaWiki support desk), Drupal forums, etc., weren't so rich as they are with data given by volunteers.
#2: Post edited
I agree with the notion that reputation numbers cause more harm than good, at least in the long run.I was not convinced by any argument I have read so far to why its "sorely needed".- People ask and answer in fields of knowledge that they have interest to understand in / be grasped as understanding in; if the main motivator was points, then Wikipedia articles and community websites (say, MediaWiki support desk), Drupal forums, etc., weren't so rich as they are with data given by volunteers.
- I agree with the notion that reputation numbers cause more harm than good, at least in general and at least in the long run.
- I was not convinced by any argument I have read so far to why its "sorely needed" here in Codidact.
- People ask and answer in fields of knowledge that they have interest to understand in / be grasped as understanding in; if the main motivator was points, then Wikipedia articles and community websites (say, MediaWiki support desk), Drupal forums, etc., weren't so rich as they are with data given by volunteers.
#1: Initial revision
I agree with the notion that reputation numbers cause more harm than good, at least in the long run. I was not convinced by any argument I have read so far to why its "sorely needed". People ask and answer in fields of knowledge that they have interest to understand in / be grasped as understanding in; if the main motivator was points, then Wikipedia articles and community websites (say, MediaWiki support desk), Drupal forums, etc., weren't so rich as they are with data given by volunteers.