Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Post History
The "status-" part provides context that can be useful for people not intimately familiar with the site. The upside of getting rid of "status-" is very minimal. Extra clarity is usually a good th...
Answer
#1: Initial revision
by
Olin Lathrop
·
2021-04-26T13:04:35Z (over 3 years ago)
The "status-" part provides context that can be useful for people not intimately familiar with the site. The upside of getting rid of "status-" is very minimal. Extra clarity is usually a good thing, and worth keeping in this case. For example, suppose someone asked about why a tag was declined or a feature related to that. Just a "declined" tag would be confusing, while "status-declined" would not be. Then there is also the perception of the site only being for the "in" crowd. <i>Those who don't already know that "declined" really means "status-declined" need not apply.</i>