Post History

If a user is moderator in SE than that person can be moderator in Codidact. But, if no moderator joins the Codidact than does it mean Codidact can't get any moderators. 

- While those peoples can be moderator in SE who have lots of reputation. But, Codidact is completely new. So, is it ok to make those people moderator who have lots of reputation in Codidact. 

Top user list in Meta Codidact :

1. Monica Cellio has 7726 rep (already a moderator and staff)
2. ArtOfCode has 4594 rep (already a moderator and staff)
3. luap42 has 3157 rep (already a moderator and staff)
4. Canina has 2525 rep 
5. Moshi has 2316 rep
6. Mithical has 1554 rep (already a moderator and staff)
7. Olin Lathrop has 1539 rep 
8. Manassehkatz has 1334 rep (already a moderator and staff)
9. Lundin has 1219 rep 
10. Zerotime has 1135 rep

As you can see it's very hard to earn reputation. And, only posting good questions and answers doesn't mean that person is honest and "hardworker". So, I don't think that it is ok to depend on reputation. I will request a feature for judging "moderators". In SE, we can review posts. So, if a user honestly review lot of posts than we can say that, that person is honest, "hardworker" and that person knows rules of Codidact. He can be a moderator in Codidact. I think this would be best way to choose Moderators. But, I know that it will take lot of times to build the feature. So, currently the staffs should think something else. From my point of view currently they should judge peoples by how peoples are behaving in comments and how peoples are posting how peoples flagging posts. Than that person is worth to be a moderator. But, if the user does something wrong with the community that person must be banned from the community(Cause, we are judging by comments and postings we don't know how honest the person is. So, I will call it "test-moderator" for now).