Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Post History
I would always claim that anonymous upvoting and downvoting are a crappy quality assurance method causing more harm than good in the long run due to unbased (or well based) accumulated hostility an...
#4: Post edited
- I would always claim that anonymous upvoting and downvoting are a crappy quality assurance method causing more harm than good in the long run due to unbased (or well based) accumulated hostility and would generally not even use it but if it is the only method to get communal feedback on a user's posts I would reluctantly use it.
It's a bit frustrating for me to check every Codidact website to learn how a given post of mine (or of another user) was received by the community. I'd prefer to have visit some single webpage that will show two tables per network website (one for questions and one for answers) with any post I have published in any website in the network (probably it will include a pager in case there are too many posts per table) and from there to easily know how many upvotes and upvotes each post got (if at all) and on the way, to know what is my "reputation points number" on the relevant network website.
- I would always claim that anonymous upvoting and downvoting are a crappy quality assurance method causing more harm than good in the long run due to unbased (or well based) accumulated hostility and would generally not even use it but if it is the only method to get communal feedback on a user's posts I would reluctantly use it.
- It's a bit frustrating for me to check every Codidact website to learn how a given post of mine (or of another user) was received by the community.<br>
- I'd prefer to have visit some single webpage that will show two tables per network website (one for questions and one for answers) with any post I have published in any website in the network (probably it will include a pager in case there are too many posts per table);<br>
- From there, to easily know how many upvotes and upvotes each post got (if at all) and on the way, to know what is my "reputation points number" on the relevant network website.
#3: Post edited
Understanding how posts were possibly received by the community network wide
- Understanding how posts were possibly received by the community --- network wide
#2: Post edited
- I would always claim that anonymous upvoting and downvoting are a crappy quality assurance method causing more harm than good in the long run due to unbased (or well based) accumulated hostility and would generally not even use it but if it is the only method to get communal feedback on a user's posts I would reluctantly use it.
It's a bit frustrating for me to check website after website in the network to learn how a given post of mine (or of another user) was received by the community and I would prefer to do so from just one place, so, where can a user read about its own (or another user's) user account voting movements in general (in the network in its entirety and not in a particular website)?
- I would always claim that anonymous upvoting and downvoting are a crappy quality assurance method causing more harm than good in the long run due to unbased (or well based) accumulated hostility and would generally not even use it but if it is the only method to get communal feedback on a user's posts I would reluctantly use it.
- It's a bit frustrating for me to check every Codidact website to learn how a given post of mine (or of another user) was received by the community. I'd prefer to have visit some single webpage that will show two tables per network website (one for questions and one for answers) with any post I have published in any website in the network (probably it will include a pager in case there are too many posts per table) and from there to easily know how many upvotes and upvotes each post got (if at all) and on the way, to know what is my "reputation points number" on the relevant network website.
#1: Initial revision
Understanding how posts were possibly received by the community network wide
I would always claim that anonymous upvoting and downvoting are a crappy quality assurance method causing more harm than good in the long run due to unbased (or well based) accumulated hostility and would generally not even use it but if it is the only method to get communal feedback on a user's posts I would reluctantly use it. It's a bit frustrating for me to check website after website in the network to learn how a given post of mine (or of another user) was received by the community and I would prefer to do so from just one place, so, where can a user read about its own (or another user's) user account voting movements in general (in the network in its entirety and not in a particular website)?