Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Post History
I was reading this question. I was trying to flag something as duplicate. When I tried to flag as duplicate with no details, I got the message Thanks! A moderator will review your flag. That m...
#5: Post edited
by
Monica Cellio
·
2021-06-24T14:06:41Z (almost 3 years ago)
#4: Post edited
by
Monica Cellio
·
2021-06-10T13:54:58Z (almost 3 years ago)
#3: Post edited
by
Dani
·
2021-05-07T17:23:24Z (almost 3 years ago)
English!!!!!!!
flagging as duplicate without any details shouldn't be allowed
I was reading [the question](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/278655). I was trying to check to flagging as duplicate again. When I tried to flag as duplicate with no details, I got the message `Thanks! A moderator will review your flag.`- 
- 
That maybe a problem. It have to be fixed. Otherwise lot of people will troll with it. `Eventually if codidact becomes big people can "troll" by closing question with themselves as the target` As a comment is saying in [this post](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/278661#answer-278661). It won't completely like trolling. But, **moderator will feel annoying to review flags like that.**
- I was reading [this question](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/278655). I was trying to flag something as duplicate. When I tried to flag as duplicate with no details, I got the message `Thanks! A moderator will review your flag.`
- 
- 
- That may be a problem. It has to be fixed. Otherwise, a lot of people will troll with it. `Eventually if codidact becomes big people can "troll" by closing question with themselves as the target` As a comment says in [this post](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/278661#answer-278661). It won't be completely like trolling, but **a moderator will be annoyed by having to review flags like that.**
#2: Post edited
flagging as duplicate without any details error
- flagging as duplicate without any details shouldn't be allowed
#1: Initial revision
flagging as duplicate without any details error
I was reading [the question](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/278655). I was trying to check to flagging as duplicate again. When I tried to flag as duplicate with no details, I got the message `Thanks! A moderator will review your flag.`   That maybe a problem. It have to be fixed. Otherwise lot of people will troll with it. `Eventually if codidact becomes big people can "troll" by closing question with themselves as the target` As a comment is saying in [this post](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/278661#answer-278661). It won't completely like trolling. But, **moderator will feel annoying to review flags like that.**