Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Post History

44%
+2 −3
Q&A Is it OK to edit a post in order to bump it?

I was reviewing some post in SE about bumping post which is related to this question. I got a point of his question. Read the question, the user was doing annoying edits to his post only to bump hi...

1 answer  ·  posted 3y ago by deleted user  ·  edited 3y ago by Mithical‭

#4: Post edited by user avatar Mithical‭ · 2021-05-11T05:29:01Z (almost 3 years ago)
  • Is it OK to bump post when user does annoying edits
  • Is it OK to edit a post in order to bump it?
#3: Post edited by (deleted user) · 2021-05-11T04:11:24Z (almost 3 years ago)
  • Is it OK to bump post when user edits.
  • Is it OK to bump post when user does annoying edits
#2: Post edited by (deleted user) · 2021-05-10T14:22:32Z (almost 3 years ago)
  • I was reviewing some post in SE about bumping post which is related to [this question](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/281610). I got a point of his question. Read [the question](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/270481/how-to-bump-a-question-up-if-you-have-low-reputation), the user was doing annoying edits to his post only to bump his post. Here's the [revision history link](https://stackoverflow.com/posts/25613330/revisions). Most of his edit was pointless. So, **I think Codidact community should be strict for the reason**. When user does edits like that post, of course the post will be bump. But, if it keep happens than it will become very annoying for answerer. [A forum](https://devforum.roblox.com/t/can-editing-posts-not-bump-them-please/622328) created a poll, *Should the edited post to have the option to be bumped?*
  • ![image](https://meta.codidact.com/uploads/VXnaW8DMXct15noZ3kdMytQk)
  • Most of people chose "*Edited posts should have the option to be bumped*". I am not telling Codidact community to create poll. But, if Codidact does than most of user will choose the same option. I am not agreeing with [the post](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/281610) although. That's why I have created the post. I have bold the line which I want to tell the moderator/users/staffs.
  • I was reviewing some post in SE about bumping post which is related to [this question](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/281610). I got a point of his question. Read [the question](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/270481/how-to-bump-a-question-up-if-you-have-low-reputation), the user was doing annoying edits to his post only to bump his post. Here's the [revision history link](https://stackoverflow.com/posts/25613330/revisions). Most of his edit was pointless. So, **I think Codidact community should be strict for the reason**. When user does edits like that post, of course the post will be bump. But, if it keep happens than it will become very annoying for answerer. [A forum](https://devforum.roblox.com/t/can-editing-posts-not-bump-them-please/622328) created a poll, *Should the edited post to have the option to be bumped?*
  • ![image](https://meta.codidact.com/uploads/VXnaW8DMXct15noZ3kdMytQk)
  • Most of people chose "*Edited posts should have the option to be bumped*". I am not telling Codidact community to create poll. But, if Codidact does than most of user will choose the same option. I am not agreeing with [the post](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/281610) although. That's why I have created the post. I have bold the line which I want to tell the moderator/users/staffs.
  • >[An unknown user answered](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/82295), continuously editing your questions/answers to bump the question is considered abuse of the system
#1: Initial revision by (deleted user) · 2021-05-10T14:18:07Z (almost 3 years ago)
Is it OK to bump post when user edits.
I was reviewing some post in SE about bumping post which is related to [this question](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/281610). I got a point of his question. Read [the question](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/270481/how-to-bump-a-question-up-if-you-have-low-reputation), the user was doing annoying edits to his post only to bump his post. Here's the [revision history link](https://stackoverflow.com/posts/25613330/revisions). Most of his edit was pointless. So, **I think Codidact community should be strict for the reason**. When user does edits like that post, of course the post will be bump. But, if it keep happens than it will become very annoying for answerer. [A forum](https://devforum.roblox.com/t/can-editing-posts-not-bump-them-please/622328) created a poll, *Should the edited post to have the option to be bumped?*

![image](https://meta.codidact.com/uploads/VXnaW8DMXct15noZ3kdMytQk)

Most of people chose "*Edited posts should have the option to be bumped*". I am not telling Codidact community to create poll. But, if Codidact does than most of user will choose the same option. I am not agreeing with [the post](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/281610) although. That's why I have created the post. I have bold the line which I want to tell the moderator/users/staffs.