Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Post History

81%
+7 −0
Q&A Questions themselves are not the first Codidact hits on Google

I got the two best ranked questions in Software Development Codidact and searched their titles verbatim in Google, Does the location of an import statement affect performance in Python? How sho...

1 answer  ·  posted 3y ago by Quasímodo‭  ·  edited 3y ago by Moshi‭

#3: Post edited by user avatar Moshi‭ · 2021-05-22T17:20:17Z (over 3 years ago)
Tagged as "marketing" (for the sake of organizing SEO/marketing/general outreach discussion posts)
Questions themselves are not the first Codidact hits on Google
I got the two best ranked questions in Software Development Codidact and searched their titles verbatim in Google,

1. [Does the location of an import statement affect performance in Python?][1]
2. [How should we share some content between two otherwise-independent git repositories?][2]

I submitted the queries from Tor sessions so as not to stain the results with possible local filtering and to repeat the experiment from some different locations.

Stack Overflow had always the first results, even though there was no perfect match, but that is not what surprised me.

### From Netherlands exit node

1. The first Codidact result (the only one on the first page) was [posts tagged Python][3].

2. The first Codidact results (the only ones on the first page) were [Monica Cellio's activities][4] and, next, [posts tagged version control][5].

### From United States exit node

1. The first Codidact result (the only one on the second page) was [Software Development questions sorted by score][7].

2. The first Codidact result (the only one on the second page) was  [Meriton's profile][6].

### From Austria exit node

1. No results on the first three pages.

2. Second and third results on Google, again [Monica Cellio's activities][4] and [posts tagged version control][3].

### What about DuckDuckGo?

No results on the first three pages in any case.

## Discussion

What could be the reasons for Google not to list the questions themselves as results, but instead to list pages that contain links to those questions?

Surely we cannot change Google's sorting algorithm, but is there something at all that can be done at Codidact to improve the chance that the questions are the first Codidact hits? Maybe this is something that will solve itself as Codidact becomes more popular and we should only be patient?

_PS: I made similar experiments with Writing posts, with similar results, namely the questions per se were not the first Codidact hit. With Electrical Engineering, however, I could get a question to be the hit, so it is at least possible._

[1]: https://software.codidact.com/posts/279363
[2]: https://software.codidact.com/posts/277288
[3]: https://software.codidact.com/categories/38/tags/3293
[4]: https://software.codidact.com/users/8046/activity
[5]: https://software.codidact.com/categories/38/tags/4117
[6]: https://software.codidact.com/users/53280
[7]: https://software.codidact.com/?sort=score
#2: Post edited by user avatar Quasímodo‭ · 2021-05-18T13:05:02Z (over 3 years ago)
  • Questions are not Google hits, but rather
  • Questions themselves are not the first Codidact hits on Google
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Quasímodo‭ · 2021-05-18T13:04:04Z (over 3 years ago)
Questions are not Google hits, but rather 
I got the two best ranked questions in Software Development Codidact and searched their titles verbatim in Google,

1. [Does the location of an import statement affect performance in Python?][1]
2. [How should we share some content between two otherwise-independent git repositories?][2]

I submitted the queries from Tor sessions so as not to stain the results with possible local filtering and to repeat the experiment from some different locations.

Stack Overflow had always the first results, even though there was no perfect match, but that is not what surprised me.

### From Netherlands exit node

1. The first Codidact result (the only one on the first page) was [posts tagged Python][3].

2. The first Codidact results (the only ones on the first page) were [Monica Cellio's activities][4] and, next, [posts tagged version control][5].

### From United States exit node

1. The first Codidact result (the only one on the second page) was [Software Development questions sorted by score][7].

2. The first Codidact result (the only one on the second page) was  [Meriton's profile][6].

### From Austria exit node

1. No results on the first three pages.

2. Second and third results on Google, again [Monica Cellio's activities][4] and [posts tagged version control][3].

### What about DuckDuckGo?

No results on the first three pages in any case.

## Discussion

What could be the reasons for Google not to list the questions themselves as results, but instead to list pages that contain links to those questions?

Surely we cannot change Google's sorting algorithm, but is there something at all that can be done at Codidact to improve the chance that the questions are the first Codidact hits? Maybe this is something that will solve itself as Codidact becomes more popular and we should only be patient?

_PS: I made similar experiments with Writing posts, with similar results, namely the questions per se were not the first Codidact hit. With Electrical Engineering, however, I could get a question to be the hit, so it is at least possible._

[1]: https://software.codidact.com/posts/279363
[2]: https://software.codidact.com/posts/277288
[3]: https://software.codidact.com/categories/38/tags/3293
[4]: https://software.codidact.com/users/8046/activity
[5]: https://software.codidact.com/categories/38/tags/4117
[6]: https://software.codidact.com/users/53280
[7]: https://software.codidact.com/?sort=score