Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Post History
I am leaving CD by giving my last idea to it. Some user will downvote this question just to take revenge (I don't know who they are). But, I believe I got some hostility here. Last message to my h...
#4: Post edited
- <h6> <s>I am leaving CD by giving my last idea to it.</s> Some user will downvote this question just to take revenge (I don't know who they are). But, I believe I got some hostility here. Last message to my hostility,"If I had done something wrong to you than, Sorry! If you don't want to forgive me than, it's OK cause, I don't know you even you don't know me. :) Rest in peace."</h6>
- <hr/>
- In [this answer](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/280044#answer-280044), Luap had said,"**Reputation can produce negative behaviors**" (I lost some links of Forum Codidact's reputation discussion they were useful. But, I lost them that's why I couldn't mention those context). We earn/lose reputation from "anonymous user" (We just can't know who had upvoted and downvoted). But, we get [reaction](https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/pull/553) from specific user(We can know who had reacted on your post). So, I would like to give reaction priority instead of Reputation. I want to show reaction score instead of reputation in profile or, user tab
-  Just as [PhysicsForum](https://www.physicsforums.com/members/delta2.189563/) shows. But, I want to show something more in profile. Profile will show
- Outdated, Bad, Dangerous and Worked for me.
- - Outdated : It was working earlier. (So, no negative credit).
- - Worked for me : It is working. (positive credit)
- - Bad : The answer needs some improvements. (leaving it to staff/public) (I want it cause, some user (Me) can't write answer in English properly. If they correct everything than, that user should retract his reaction. Earlier I had answered a question then, I asked why I got downvote Olin said it's for bad English. After writing the answer properly that user didn't retract. Which is totally not good (telling it from experience of Math SE). )
- - Dangerous : Never try it (negative credit).
Above context changes depending on community. Questioner gets nothing cause, they are here looking for help. Bad questions can't get good answer until it is understandable. So, questioner needs nothing. Although, there's upvote and downvote system. But, no one will care of it. If someone creates a new account than, react on his own post. Which post didn't work for anyone. Than, moderator should have access to retract that reaction. Currently, some user creates new account and upvote his own post only for reputation(which isn't good). In EE community, there's a duplicate account of Olin Lathrop. His name is Olin Elthrop. Not only one there's two account. I guess, someone else had created those accounts. He/She could use those accounts to take revenge (by downvoting posts) or, he/she could upvote his own post. But, we can know who had reacted to post. Moderator can't retract upvote or, downvote but they should have access to retract (remove) other's reaction (Which I already mentioned earlier). Even, users don't have to explain why they had downvoted a post. But, they have to explain why it is dangerous while reacting.
- <h6> <s>I am leaving CD by giving my last idea to it.</s> Some user will downvote this question just to take revenge (I don't know who they are). But, I believe I got some hostility here. Last message to my hostility,"If I had done something wrong to you than, Sorry! If you don't want to forgive me than, it's OK cause, I don't know you even you don't know me. :) Rest in peace."</h6>
- <hr/>
- In [this answer](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/280044#answer-280044), Luap had said,"**Reputation can produce negative behaviors**" (I lost some links of Forum Codidact's reputation discussion they were useful. But, I lost them that's why I couldn't mention those context). We earn/lose reputation from "anonymous user" (We just can't know who had upvoted and downvoted). But, we get [reaction](https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/pull/553) from specific user(We can know who had reacted on your post). So, I would like to give reaction priority instead of Reputation. I want to show reaction score instead of reputation in profile or, user tab
-  Just as [PhysicsForum](https://www.physicsforums.com/members/delta2.189563/) shows. But, I want to show something more in profile. Profile will show
- Outdated, Bad, Dangerous and Worked for me.
- - Outdated : It was working earlier. (So, no negative credit).
- - Worked for me : It is working. (positive credit)
- - Bad : The answer needs some improvements. (leaving it to staff/public) (I want it cause, some user (Me) can't write answer in English properly. If they correct everything than, that user should retract his reaction. Earlier I had answered a question then, I asked why I got downvote Olin said it's for bad English. After writing the answer properly that user didn't retract. Which is totally not good (telling it from experience of Math SE). )
- - Dangerous : Never try it (negative credit).
- Above context changes depending on community. Questioner gets nothing cause, they are here looking for help. Bad questions can't get good answer until it is understandable. So, questioner needs nothing. Although, there's upvote and downvote system. But, no one will care of it. If someone creates a new account than, react on his own post. Which post didn't work for anyone. Than, moderator should have access to retract that reaction. Currently, some user creates new account and upvote his own post only for reputation(which isn't good). In EE community, there's a duplicate account of Olin Lathrop. His name is Olin Elthrop. Not only one there's two account. I guess, someone else had created those accounts. He/She could use those accounts to take revenge (by downvoting posts) or, he/she could upvote his own post. But, we can know who had reacted to post. Moderator can't retract upvote or, downvote but they should have access to retract (remove) other's reaction (Which I already mentioned earlier). Even, users don't have to explain why they had downvoted a post. But, they have to explain why it is dangerous while reacting.
- In short : I want to reaction score instead of reputation. But, I was thinking of meta sites for a long time. But, I didn't find aout way for meta (If reaction doesn't exist in meta)
#3: Post edited
- <h6> <s>I am leaving CD by giving my last idea to it.</s> Some user will downvote this question just to take revenge (I don't know who they are). But, I believe I got some hostility here. Last message to my hostility,"If I had done something wrong to you than, Sorry! If you don't want to forgive me than, it's OK cause, I don't know you even you don't know me. :) Rest in peace."</h6>
- <hr/>
In [this answer](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/280044#answer-280044), Luap had said,"**Reputation can produce negative behaviors**". We earn/lose reputation from "anonymous user" (We just can't know who had upvoted and downvoted). But, we get [reaction](https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/pull/553) from specific user(We can know who had reacted on your post). So, I would like to give reaction priority instead of Reputation. I want to show reaction score instead of reputation in profile or, user tab-  Just as [PhysicsForum](https://www.physicsforums.com/members/delta2.189563/) shows. But, I want to show something more in profile. Profile will show
- Outdated, Bad, Dangerous and Worked for me.
- - Outdated : It was working earlier. (So, no negative credit).
- - Worked for me : It is working. (positive credit)
- - Bad : The answer needs some improvements. (leaving it to staff/public) (I want it cause, some user (Me) can't write answer in English properly. If they correct everything than, that user should retract his reaction. Earlier I had answered a question then, I asked why I got downvote Olin said it's for bad English. After writing the answer properly that user didn't retract. Which is totally not good (telling it from experience of Math SE). )
- - Dangerous : Never try it (negative credit).
- Above context changes depending on community. Questioner gets nothing cause, they are here looking for help. Bad questions can't get good answer until it is understandable. So, questioner needs nothing. Although, there's upvote and downvote system. But, no one will care of it. If someone creates a new account than, react on his own post. Which post didn't work for anyone. Than, moderator should have access to retract that reaction. Currently, some user creates new account and upvote his own post only for reputation(which isn't good). In EE community, there's a duplicate account of Olin Lathrop. His name is Olin Elthrop. Not only one there's two account. I guess, someone else had created those accounts. He/She could use those accounts to take revenge (by downvoting posts) or, he/she could upvote his own post. But, we can know who had reacted to post. Moderator can't retract upvote or, downvote but they should have access to retract (remove) other's reaction (Which I already mentioned earlier). Even, users don't have to explain why they had downvoted a post. But, they have to explain why it is dangerous while reacting.
- <h6> <s>I am leaving CD by giving my last idea to it.</s> Some user will downvote this question just to take revenge (I don't know who they are). But, I believe I got some hostility here. Last message to my hostility,"If I had done something wrong to you than, Sorry! If you don't want to forgive me than, it's OK cause, I don't know you even you don't know me. :) Rest in peace."</h6>
- <hr/>
- In [this answer](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/280044#answer-280044), Luap had said,"**Reputation can produce negative behaviors**" (I lost some links of Forum Codidact's reputation discussion they were useful. But, I lost them that's why I couldn't mention those context). We earn/lose reputation from "anonymous user" (We just can't know who had upvoted and downvoted). But, we get [reaction](https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/pull/553) from specific user(We can know who had reacted on your post). So, I would like to give reaction priority instead of Reputation. I want to show reaction score instead of reputation in profile or, user tab
-  Just as [PhysicsForum](https://www.physicsforums.com/members/delta2.189563/) shows. But, I want to show something more in profile. Profile will show
- Outdated, Bad, Dangerous and Worked for me.
- - Outdated : It was working earlier. (So, no negative credit).
- - Worked for me : It is working. (positive credit)
- - Bad : The answer needs some improvements. (leaving it to staff/public) (I want it cause, some user (Me) can't write answer in English properly. If they correct everything than, that user should retract his reaction. Earlier I had answered a question then, I asked why I got downvote Olin said it's for bad English. After writing the answer properly that user didn't retract. Which is totally not good (telling it from experience of Math SE). )
- - Dangerous : Never try it (negative credit).
- Above context changes depending on community. Questioner gets nothing cause, they are here looking for help. Bad questions can't get good answer until it is understandable. So, questioner needs nothing. Although, there's upvote and downvote system. But, no one will care of it. If someone creates a new account than, react on his own post. Which post didn't work for anyone. Than, moderator should have access to retract that reaction. Currently, some user creates new account and upvote his own post only for reputation(which isn't good). In EE community, there's a duplicate account of Olin Lathrop. His name is Olin Elthrop. Not only one there's two account. I guess, someone else had created those accounts. He/She could use those accounts to take revenge (by downvoting posts) or, he/she could upvote his own post. But, we can know who had reacted to post. Moderator can't retract upvote or, downvote but they should have access to retract (remove) other's reaction (Which I already mentioned earlier). Even, users don't have to explain why they had downvoted a post. But, they have to explain why it is dangerous while reacting.
#2: Post edited
- <h6> <s>I am leaving CD by giving my last idea to it.</s> Some user will downvote this question just to take revenge (I don't know who they are). But, I believe I got some hostility here. Last message to my hostility,"If I had done something wrong to you than, Sorry! If you don't want to forgive me than, it's OK cause, I don't know you even you don't know me. :) Rest in peace."</h6>
- <hr/>
- In [this answer](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/280044#answer-280044), Luap had said,"**Reputation can produce negative behaviors**". We earn/lose reputation from "anonymous user" (We just can't know who had upvoted and downvoted). But, we get [reaction](https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/pull/553) from specific user(We can know who had reacted on your post). So, I would like to give reaction priority instead of Reputation. I want to show reaction score instead of reputation in profile or, user tab
-  Just as [PhysicsForum](https://www.physicsforums.com/members/delta2.189563/) shows. But, I want to show something more in profile. Profile will show
- Outdated, Bad, Dangerous and Worked for me.
- - Outdated : It was working earlier. (So, no negative credit).
- - Worked for me : It is working. (positive credit)
- Bad : The answer needs some improvements. (leaving it to staff/public)- - Dangerous : Never try it (negative credit).
Above context changes depending on community. Questioner gets nothing cause, they are here looking for help. Bad questions can't get good answer until it is understandable. So, questioner needs nothing. Although, there's upvote and downvote system. But, no one will care of it. If someone creates a new account than, react on his own post. Which post didn't work for anyone. Than, moderator should have access to retract that reaction. Currently, some user creates new account and upvote his own post only for reputation(which isn't good). In EE community, there's a duplicate account of Olin Lathrop. His name is Olin Elthrop. Not only one there's two account. I guess, someone else had created those accounts. He/She could use those accounts to take revenge (by downvoting posts) or, he/she could upvote his own post. But, we can know who had reacted to post. Moderator can't retract upvote or, downvote but they should have access to retract (remove) other's reaction (Which I already mentioned earlier).
- <h6> <s>I am leaving CD by giving my last idea to it.</s> Some user will downvote this question just to take revenge (I don't know who they are). But, I believe I got some hostility here. Last message to my hostility,"If I had done something wrong to you than, Sorry! If you don't want to forgive me than, it's OK cause, I don't know you even you don't know me. :) Rest in peace."</h6>
- <hr/>
- In [this answer](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/280044#answer-280044), Luap had said,"**Reputation can produce negative behaviors**". We earn/lose reputation from "anonymous user" (We just can't know who had upvoted and downvoted). But, we get [reaction](https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/pull/553) from specific user(We can know who had reacted on your post). So, I would like to give reaction priority instead of Reputation. I want to show reaction score instead of reputation in profile or, user tab
-  Just as [PhysicsForum](https://www.physicsforums.com/members/delta2.189563/) shows. But, I want to show something more in profile. Profile will show
- Outdated, Bad, Dangerous and Worked for me.
- - Outdated : It was working earlier. (So, no negative credit).
- - Worked for me : It is working. (positive credit)
- - Bad : The answer needs some improvements. (leaving it to staff/public) (I want it cause, some user (Me) can't write answer in English properly. If they correct everything than, that user should retract his reaction. Earlier I had answered a question then, I asked why I got downvote Olin said it's for bad English. After writing the answer properly that user didn't retract. Which is totally not good (telling it from experience of Math SE). )
- - Dangerous : Never try it (negative credit).
- Above context changes depending on community. Questioner gets nothing cause, they are here looking for help. Bad questions can't get good answer until it is understandable. So, questioner needs nothing. Although, there's upvote and downvote system. But, no one will care of it. If someone creates a new account than, react on his own post. Which post didn't work for anyone. Than, moderator should have access to retract that reaction. Currently, some user creates new account and upvote his own post only for reputation(which isn't good). In EE community, there's a duplicate account of Olin Lathrop. His name is Olin Elthrop. Not only one there's two account. I guess, someone else had created those accounts. He/She could use those accounts to take revenge (by downvoting posts) or, he/she could upvote his own post. But, we can know who had reacted to post. Moderator can't retract upvote or, downvote but they should have access to retract (remove) other's reaction (Which I already mentioned earlier). Even, users don't have to explain why they had downvoted a post. But, they have to explain why it is dangerous while reacting.
#1: Initial revision
changes to reputation
<h6> <s>I am leaving CD by giving my last idea to it.</s> Some user will downvote this question just to take revenge (I don't know who they are). But, I believe I got some hostility here. Last message to my hostility,"If I had done something wrong to you than, Sorry! If you don't want to forgive me than, it's OK cause, I don't know you even you don't know me. :) Rest in peace."</h6> <hr/> In [this answer](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/280044#answer-280044), Luap had said,"**Reputation can produce negative behaviors**". We earn/lose reputation from "anonymous user" (We just can't know who had upvoted and downvoted). But, we get [reaction](https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/pull/553) from specific user(We can know who had reacted on your post). So, I would like to give reaction priority instead of Reputation. I want to show reaction score instead of reputation in profile or, user tab  Just as [PhysicsForum](https://www.physicsforums.com/members/delta2.189563/) shows. But, I want to show something more in profile. Profile will show Outdated, Bad, Dangerous and Worked for me. - Outdated : It was working earlier. (So, no negative credit). - Worked for me : It is working. (positive credit) - Bad : The answer needs some improvements. (leaving it to staff/public) - Dangerous : Never try it (negative credit). Above context changes depending on community. Questioner gets nothing cause, they are here looking for help. Bad questions can't get good answer until it is understandable. So, questioner needs nothing. Although, there's upvote and downvote system. But, no one will care of it. If someone creates a new account than, react on his own post. Which post didn't work for anyone. Than, moderator should have access to retract that reaction. Currently, some user creates new account and upvote his own post only for reputation(which isn't good). In EE community, there's a duplicate account of Olin Lathrop. His name is Olin Elthrop. Not only one there's two account. I guess, someone else had created those accounts. He/She could use those accounts to take revenge (by downvoting posts) or, he/she could upvote his own post. But, we can know who had reacted to post. Moderator can't retract upvote or, downvote but they should have access to retract (remove) other's reaction (Which I already mentioned earlier).