Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Post History
The idea is pretty nice. This post of mine has become a duplicate of this one, which has the same premise as this. And as I love the idea, I actually made (kinda crappy)[1] icons for these existin...
Answer
#2: Post edited
by
General Sebast1an
·
2021-08-31T07:48:12Z (about 3 years ago)
- The idea is pretty nice. [This post of mine has become a duplicate of this one, which has the same premise as this.](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/283446)
And as I love the idea, [I actually made (kinda crappy)<sup>[1]</sup> icons for these existing sites](https://github.com/JoyrenceMatthewAgas/CodidactDesigning). Also in [chat (Discord)], some of these icons I created became the basis of newer emojis:- <sup>[2]</sup>
- These are most likely the icons to be put in place when we think we should get a favicon for a site. It's not mandatory, as they say, but if a bunch support it, then they'll get what they want. A site without a favicon will have the default Codidact logo.
- ###### Notes:
- - <sup>[1]: In "kinda crappy", I mean that some of these images on the repo are quite blurry since the softwares I use for making them caused some weird stuff.</sup>
- - <sup>[2]: The first 4 emojis are not logos of the communities, except for the default Codidact logo. 101, amen, and the Codidactyl are not logos of the sites.</sup>
- The idea is pretty nice. [This post of mine has become a duplicate of this one, which has the same premise as this.](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/283446)
- And as I love the idea, [I actually made (kinda crappy)<sup>[1]</sup> icons for these existing sites](https://github.com/JoyrenceMatthewAgas/CodidactDesigning). Also in [chat (Discord)](https://discord.gg/bv2aaGa), some of these icons I created became the basis of newer emojis:
- <sup>[2]</sup>
- These are most likely the icons to be put in place when we think we should get a favicon for a site. It's not mandatory, as they say, but if a bunch support it, then they'll get what they want. A site without a favicon will have the default Codidact logo.
- ###### Notes:
- - <sup>[1]: In "kinda crappy", I mean that some of these images on the repo are quite blurry since the softwares I use for making them caused some weird stuff.</sup>
- - <sup>[2]: The first 4 emojis are not logos of the communities, except for the default Codidact logo. 101, amen, and the Codidactyl are not logos of the sites.</sup>
#1: Initial revision
by
General Sebast1an
·
2021-08-31T07:45:39Z (about 3 years ago)
The idea is pretty nice. [This post of mine has become a duplicate of this one, which has the same premise as this.](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/283446) And as I love the idea, [I actually made (kinda crappy)<sup>[1]</sup> icons for these existing sites](https://github.com/JoyrenceMatthewAgas/CodidactDesigning). Also in [chat (Discord)], some of these icons I created became the basis of newer emojis: <sup>[2]</sup> These are most likely the icons to be put in place when we think we should get a favicon for a site. It's not mandatory, as they say, but if a bunch support it, then they'll get what they want. A site without a favicon will have the default Codidact logo. ###### Notes: - <sup>[1]: In "kinda crappy", I mean that some of these images on the repo are quite blurry since the softwares I use for making them caused some weird stuff.</sup> - <sup>[2]: The first 4 emojis are not logos of the communities, except for the default Codidact logo. 101, amen, and the Codidactyl are not logos of the sites.</sup>