Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Post History

60%
+1 −0
Q&A Should we modify the default (front) page for anonymous visitors?

I suggest we show questions in the list differently depending on their rating. Good questions are show as they are now. Poorly received questions are shown visually de-emphasized, like smaller te...

posted 3y ago by Olin Lathrop‭

Answer
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Olin Lathrop‭ · 2021-12-07T14:42:58Z (almost 3 years ago)
I suggest we show questions in the list differently depending on their rating.  Good questions are show as they are now.  Poorly received questions are shown visually de-emphasized, like smaller text, less detail, and partially grayed out.

Since it takes some time for questions to be rated by votes, new questions would also be shown differently.  These might be highlighted somehow, like with a green background.  It emphasizes where regular users should spend time.  Perhaps the vote totals shouldn't be shown in the list at all for new questions.  New questions would be considered rated after some time, or after some minimum number of votes accumulate.

The various parameters should be settable per site, particularly for what qualifies as new.  I have looked around several sites, and it appears that a positive score (+1 or more) is a good indicator for whether a question is "good" or not.  No automated system is perfect, but this simple criterion works surprisingly well across the sites I have looked at.

For not-logged-in users, we should probably show only the new and good questions.