Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Post History
I personally like the way you are contributing(not for voting, re-editing posts and some other stuffs).. You may have seen somewhere that, only 2 people are working as coder in the Codidact organiz...
Answer
#2: Post edited
I personally like the way you are contributing. You may have seen somewhere that, only 2 people are working as coder in the Codidact organization. So it's taking huge time to build up things. I believe Ruby on rails is little bit harder that's why most of peoples can't contribute to code. I was also a contributor. All the things I understood after working on the organization that is, "maybe I can't understand how one page is linked with another one in ruby-on-rails". One of [my friend](https://meta.codidact.com/users/54151), also said that, "after QPixel he hates ruby-on-rails" (not sure if I phrased correctly). ~ I said it cause you were looking for automatic deletion.- Everyone thinks deleting poor questions may help to speed up the growth of the community. But a staff (it's more than 3 months so I don't remember if that was staff or someone else) said, "removing all imported contents will be helpful cause some of our communities are getting down for copyright-infringement but what can we do if someone had edited and done some effort on that post?"
- >We could therefore permanently remove it from the system.
- Removing something from database permanently is never helpful. Cause there is a report in [Writing](https://writing.codidact.com/posts/281759) which had happened for "data error". We can remove thing softly- the way we are doing now.
- Usually, all the bad posts are posting by some specific users. When we say something by mentioning them, then they don't reply to our messages. I believe we should have discussion with them. It's OK not to know things but deleting their contents without informing them isn't really a good idea. So I always suggest to discuss with those persons. I sometimes worry why they don't want to listen to us.
- I had asked in Discord once when do a moderator remove [the participate](https://meta.codidact.com/abilities/everyone?for=user) and [participate everywhere](https://meta.codidact.com/abilities/unrestricted?for=53922) ability, no one replied. But if we revoke those abilities then they might come to us to discuss (I don't know even I don't think anyone will listen to me but all the things I say that is I don't care). Some may say to suspend them, I said in [the answer](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/284472/284486#answer-284486) why suspending is never helpful.
- I personally like the way you are contributing(not for voting, re-editing posts and some other [stuffs](#fake_link_not_interested_to_show_to_public_what_you_did_just_let_them_know)).. You may have seen somewhere that, only 2 people are working as coder in the Codidact organization. So it's taking huge time to build up things. I believe Ruby on rails is little bit harder that's why most of peoples can't contribute to code. I was also a contributor. All the things I understood after working on the organization that is, "maybe I can't understand how one page is linked with another one in ruby-on-rails". One of [my friend](https://meta.codidact.com/users/54151), also said that, "after QPixel he hates ruby-on-rails" (not sure if I phrased correctly). ~ I said it cause you were looking for automatic deletion.
- Everyone thinks deleting poor questions may help to speed up the growth of the community. But a staff (it's more than 3 months so I don't remember if that was staff or someone else) said, "removing all imported contents will be helpful cause some of our communities are getting down for copyright-infringement but what can we do if someone had edited and done some effort on that post?"
- >We could therefore permanently remove it from the system.
- Removing something from database permanently is never helpful. Cause there is a report in [Writing](https://writing.codidact.com/posts/281759) which had happened for "data error". We can remove thing softly- the way we are doing now.
- Usually, all the bad posts are posting by some specific users. When we say something by mentioning them, then they don't reply to our messages. I believe we should have discussion with them. It's OK not to know things but deleting their contents without informing them isn't really a good idea. So I always suggest to discuss with those persons. I sometimes worry why they don't want to listen to us.
- I had asked in Discord once when do a moderator remove [the participate](https://meta.codidact.com/abilities/everyone?for=user) and [participate everywhere](https://meta.codidact.com/abilities/unrestricted?for=53922) ability, no one replied. But if we revoke those abilities then they might come to us to discuss (I don't know even I don't think anyone will listen to me but all the things I say that is I don't care). Some may say to suspend them, I said in [the answer](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/284472/284486#answer-284486) why suspending is never helpful.
#1: Initial revision
I personally like the way you are contributing. You may have seen somewhere that, only 2 people are working as coder in the Codidact organization. So it's taking huge time to build up things. I believe Ruby on rails is little bit harder that's why most of peoples can't contribute to code. I was also a contributor. All the things I understood after working on the organization that is, "maybe I can't understand how one page is linked with another one in ruby-on-rails". One of [my friend](https://meta.codidact.com/users/54151), also said that, "after QPixel he hates ruby-on-rails" (not sure if I phrased correctly). ~ I said it cause you were looking for automatic deletion. Everyone thinks deleting poor questions may help to speed up the growth of the community. But a staff (it's more than 3 months so I don't remember if that was staff or someone else) said, "removing all imported contents will be helpful cause some of our communities are getting down for copyright-infringement but what can we do if someone had edited and done some effort on that post?" >We could therefore permanently remove it from the system. Removing something from database permanently is never helpful. Cause there is a report in [Writing](https://writing.codidact.com/posts/281759) which had happened for "data error". We can remove thing softly- the way we are doing now. Usually, all the bad posts are posting by some specific users. When we say something by mentioning them, then they don't reply to our messages. I believe we should have discussion with them. It's OK not to know things but deleting their contents without informing them isn't really a good idea. So I always suggest to discuss with those persons. I sometimes worry why they don't want to listen to us. I had asked in Discord once when do a moderator remove [the participate](https://meta.codidact.com/abilities/everyone?for=user) and [participate everywhere](https://meta.codidact.com/abilities/unrestricted?for=53922) ability, no one replied. But if we revoke those abilities then they might come to us to discuss (I don't know even I don't think anyone will listen to me but all the things I say that is I don't care). Some may say to suspend them, I said in [the answer](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/284472/284486#answer-284486) why suspending is never helpful.