Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Post History
The drop down menu at the top right of each Codidact page shows a list of all the communities in the network. The list is also linked to from the page footer, and from codidact.com. There is also ...
#4: Post edited
by
trichoplax
·
2024-10-26T12:29:59Z (26 days ago)
Footer no longer lists communities. Also say "community" instead of "site".
The drop down menu at the top right of each Codidact page shows a list of all the sites in the network. The list is also shown in the page footer, and on [codidact.com](https://codidact.com/).There is also a site for people who work on the QPixel software that Codidact runs on, called [Codidact Collab](https://collab.codidact.org/). However, this one is not included in the list of Codidact sites. Is this an intentional omission or would it be useful to include it, so that interested people can be more aware that there is support for contributing to QPixel?I understand that not all Codidact users will be interested in this particular site, but the same is true of all the Codidact sites - very few people will be interested in everything on the list.- What are the reasons for and against including Collab in the list?
- ---
- Presumably Collab would automatically become included if it were hosted on the same domain as the other communities, as suggested in [Is there an argument for having Collab under codidact.com?](https://collab.codidact.org/posts/287672)
- The drop down menu at the top right of each Codidact page shows a list of all the communities in the network. The list is also linked to from the page footer, and from [codidact.com](https://codidact.com/).
- There is also a community for people who work on the QPixel software that Codidact runs on, called [Codidact Collab](https://collab.codidact.org/). However, this one is not included in the list of Codidact communities. Is this an intentional omission or would it be useful to include it, so that interested people can be more aware that there is support for contributing to QPixel?
- I understand that not all Codidact users will be interested in this particular community, but the same is true of all the Codidact communities - very few people will be interested in everything on the list.
- What are the reasons for and against including Collab in the list?
- ---
- Presumably Collab would automatically become included if it were hosted on the same domain as the other communities, as suggested in [Is there an argument for having Collab under codidact.com?](https://collab.codidact.org/posts/287672)
#3: Post edited
by
trichoplax
·
2023-09-07T12:10:05Z (about 1 year ago)
Link to related Meta post on Collab
- The drop down menu at the top right of each Codidact page shows a list of all the sites in the network. The list is also shown in the page footer, and on [codidact.com](https://codidact.com/).
- There is also a site for people who work on the QPixel software that Codidact runs on, called [Codidact Collab](https://collab.codidact.org/). However, this one is not included in the list of Codidact sites. Is this an intentional omission or would it be useful to include it, so that interested people can be more aware that there is support for contributing to QPixel?
- I understand that not all Codidact users will be interested in this particular site, but the same is true of all the Codidact sites - very few people will be interested in everything on the list.
What are the reasons for and against including Collab in the list?
- The drop down menu at the top right of each Codidact page shows a list of all the sites in the network. The list is also shown in the page footer, and on [codidact.com](https://codidact.com/).
- There is also a site for people who work on the QPixel software that Codidact runs on, called [Codidact Collab](https://collab.codidact.org/). However, this one is not included in the list of Codidact sites. Is this an intentional omission or would it be useful to include it, so that interested people can be more aware that there is support for contributing to QPixel?
- I understand that not all Codidact users will be interested in this particular site, but the same is true of all the Codidact sites - very few people will be interested in everything on the list.
- What are the reasons for and against including Collab in the list?
- ---
- Presumably Collab would automatically become included if it were hosted on the same domain as the other communities, as suggested in [Is there an argument for having Collab under codidact.com?](https://collab.codidact.org/posts/287672)
#2: Post edited
by
trichoplax
·
2022-11-12T12:56:45Z (about 2 years ago)
Mention footer
The drop down menu at the top right of each Codidact page shows a list of all the sites in the network. The list is also shown on [codidact.com](https://codidact.com/).- There is also a site for people who work on the QPixel software that Codidact runs on, called [Codidact Collab](https://collab.codidact.org/). However, this one is not included in the list of Codidact sites. Is this an intentional omission or would it be useful to include it, so that interested people can be more aware that there is support for contributing to QPixel?
- I understand that not all Codidact users will be interested in this particular site, but the same is true of all the Codidact sites - very few people will be interested in everything on the list.
- What are the reasons for and against including Collab in the list?
- The drop down menu at the top right of each Codidact page shows a list of all the sites in the network. The list is also shown in the page footer, and on [codidact.com](https://codidact.com/).
- There is also a site for people who work on the QPixel software that Codidact runs on, called [Codidact Collab](https://collab.codidact.org/). However, this one is not included in the list of Codidact sites. Is this an intentional omission or would it be useful to include it, so that interested people can be more aware that there is support for contributing to QPixel?
- I understand that not all Codidact users will be interested in this particular site, but the same is true of all the Codidact sites - very few people will be interested in everything on the list.
- What are the reasons for and against including Collab in the list?
#1: Initial revision
by
trichoplax
·
2022-11-12T12:44:52Z (about 2 years ago)
Codidact Collab - should it be listed?
The drop down menu at the top right of each Codidact page shows a list of all the sites in the network. The list is also shown on [codidact.com](https://codidact.com/). There is also a site for people who work on the QPixel software that Codidact runs on, called [Codidact Collab](https://collab.codidact.org/). However, this one is not included in the list of Codidact sites. Is this an intentional omission or would it be useful to include it, so that interested people can be more aware that there is support for contributing to QPixel? I understand that not all Codidact users will be interested in this particular site, but the same is true of all the Codidact sites - very few people will be interested in everything on the list. What are the reasons for and against including Collab in the list?