Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Users Search
Help Dashboard Sign In Sign Up
Q&A Blog
Q&A
Posts Tags Edits
Ask Question

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Post History

75%
+4 −0
Q&A Codidact Collab - should it be listed?

Personally, I am not currently looking to learn Ruby and contribute to QPixel, but I am interested in occasionally browsing Codidact Collab to see what's happening. I only discovered it through a ...

posted 2y ago by trichoplax‭  ·  edited 10d ago by trichoplax‭

Answer
#4: Post edited by user avatar trichoplax‭ · 2024-10-26T12:32:23Z (10 days ago)
Use "community" instead of "site".
  • Personally, I am not currently looking to learn Ruby and contribute to QPixel, but I am interested in occasionally browsing Codidact Collab to see what's happening.
  • I only discovered it through a link I happened to stumble upon, and was completely unaware of it before that. If it was included in the list of sites I would have started browsing it much sooner.
  • If there isn't any harm in including it in the list, I wonder if more people browsing it might eventually lead to more people becoming contributors, even if they were initially only browsing out of interest. *(Update: as anecdotal evidence, after a period of just browsing I have ended up making contributions...)*
  • If browsing leads to trying out setting up the software locally, and that leads to questions about how to do so and common obstacles, then that provides more info for future contributors, even if the person asking the question is only setting it up out of curiosity (and doesn't become a contributor themselves).
  • I'd like to see Collab included in the list for this reason. It also wouldn't hurt that it would then be easier for me to get to the site from Codidact when I feel like browsing...
  • ## Consistency
  • Also, from a consistency perspective, I can use the Communities drop down list to get here (Codidact Meta) from Collab, so it seems strange that the same method can't take me back to Collab afterwards.
  • Personally, I am not currently looking to learn Ruby and contribute to QPixel, but I am interested in occasionally browsing Codidact Collab to see what's happening.
  • I only discovered it through a link I happened to stumble upon, and was completely unaware of it before that. If it was included in the list of communities I would have started browsing it much sooner.
  • If there isn't any harm in including it in the list, I wonder if more people browsing it might eventually lead to more people becoming contributors, even if they were initially only browsing out of interest. *(Update: as anecdotal evidence, after a period of just browsing I have ended up making contributions...)*
  • If browsing leads to trying out setting up the software locally, and that leads to questions about how to do so and common obstacles, then that provides more info for future contributors, even if the person asking the question is only setting it up out of curiosity (and doesn't become a contributor themselves).
  • I'd like to see Collab included in the list for this reason. It also wouldn't hurt that it would then be easier for me to get to the site from Codidact when I feel like browsing...
  • ## Consistency
  • Also, from a consistency perspective, I can use the Communities drop down list to get here (Codidact Meta) from Collab, so it seems strange that the same method can't take me back to Collab afterwards.
#3: Post edited by user avatar trichoplax‭ · 2023-06-29T07:53:02Z (over 1 year ago)
Add anecdotal evidence
  • Personally, I am not currently looking to learn Ruby and contribute to QPixel, but I am interested in occasionally browsing Codidact Collab to see what's happening.
  • I only discovered it through a link I happened to stumble upon, and was completely unaware of it before that. If it was included in the list of sites I would have started browsing it much sooner.
  • If there isn't any harm in including it in the list, I wonder if more people browsing it might eventually lead to more people becoming contributors, even if they were initially only browsing out of interest.
  • If browsing leads to trying out setting up the software locally, and that leads to questions about how to do so and common obstacles, then that provides more info for future contributors, even if the person asking the question is only setting it up out of curiosity (and doesn't become a contributor themselves).
  • I'd like to see Collab included in the list for this reason. It also wouldn't hurt that it would then be easier for me to get to the site from Codidact when I feel like browsing...
  • ## Consistency
  • Also, from a consistency perspective, I can use the Communities drop down list to get here (Codidact Meta) from Collab, so it seems strange that the same method can't take me back to Collab afterwards.
  • Personally, I am not currently looking to learn Ruby and contribute to QPixel, but I am interested in occasionally browsing Codidact Collab to see what's happening.
  • I only discovered it through a link I happened to stumble upon, and was completely unaware of it before that. If it was included in the list of sites I would have started browsing it much sooner.
  • If there isn't any harm in including it in the list, I wonder if more people browsing it might eventually lead to more people becoming contributors, even if they were initially only browsing out of interest. *(Update: as anecdotal evidence, after a period of just browsing I have ended up making contributions...)*
  • If browsing leads to trying out setting up the software locally, and that leads to questions about how to do so and common obstacles, then that provides more info for future contributors, even if the person asking the question is only setting it up out of curiosity (and doesn't become a contributor themselves).
  • I'd like to see Collab included in the list for this reason. It also wouldn't hurt that it would then be easier for me to get to the site from Codidact when I feel like browsing...
  • ## Consistency
  • Also, from a consistency perspective, I can use the Communities drop down list to get here (Codidact Meta) from Collab, so it seems strange that the same method can't take me back to Collab afterwards.
#2: Post edited by user avatar trichoplax‭ · 2022-12-17T23:59:54Z (almost 2 years ago)
Add consistency section
  • Personally, I am not currently looking to learn Ruby and contribute to QPixel, but I am interested in occasionally browsing Codidact Collab to see what's happening.
  • I only discovered it through a link I happened to stumble upon, and was completely unaware of it before that. If it was included in the list of sites I would have started browsing it much sooner.
  • If there isn't any harm in including it in the list, I wonder if more people browsing it might eventually lead to more people becoming contributors, even if they were initially only browsing out of interest.
  • If browsing leads to trying out setting up the software locally, and that leads to questions about how to do so and common obstacles, then that provides more info for future contributors, even if the person asking the question is only setting it up out of curiosity (and doesn't become a contributor themselves).
  • I'd like to see Collab included in the list for this reason. It also wouldn't hurt that it would then be easier for me to get to the site from Codidact when I feel like browsing...
  • Personally, I am not currently looking to learn Ruby and contribute to QPixel, but I am interested in occasionally browsing Codidact Collab to see what's happening.
  • I only discovered it through a link I happened to stumble upon, and was completely unaware of it before that. If it was included in the list of sites I would have started browsing it much sooner.
  • If there isn't any harm in including it in the list, I wonder if more people browsing it might eventually lead to more people becoming contributors, even if they were initially only browsing out of interest.
  • If browsing leads to trying out setting up the software locally, and that leads to questions about how to do so and common obstacles, then that provides more info for future contributors, even if the person asking the question is only setting it up out of curiosity (and doesn't become a contributor themselves).
  • I'd like to see Collab included in the list for this reason. It also wouldn't hurt that it would then be easier for me to get to the site from Codidact when I feel like browsing...
  • ## Consistency
  • Also, from a consistency perspective, I can use the Communities drop down list to get here (Codidact Meta) from Collab, so it seems strange that the same method can't take me back to Collab afterwards.
#1: Initial revision by user avatar trichoplax‭ · 2022-11-12T12:53:55Z (almost 2 years ago) 
Personally, I am not currently looking to learn Ruby and contribute to QPixel, but I am interested in occasionally browsing Codidact Collab to see what's happening.

I only discovered it through a link I happened to stumble upon, and was completely unaware of it before that. If it was included in the list of sites I would have started browsing it much sooner.

If there isn't any harm in including it in the list, I wonder if more people browsing it might eventually lead to more people becoming contributors, even if they were initially only browsing out of interest.

If browsing leads to trying out setting up the software locally, and that leads to questions about how to do so and common obstacles, then that provides more info for future contributors, even if the person asking the question is only setting it up out of curiosity (and doesn't become a contributor themselves).

I'd like to see Collab included in the list for this reason. It also wouldn't hurt that it would then be easier for me to get to the site from Codidact when I feel like browsing...