Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Post History
Related: Post revisions are displayed without rendered Markdown but with rendered MathJax When reviewing a suggested edit, any MathJax is presented in its rendered form, making it difficult to s...
#2: Post edited
by
Moshi
·
2023-02-18T19:14:13Z (almost 2 years ago)
Retagged
- When reviewing a suggested edit, any MathJax is presented in its rendered form, making it difficult to see what has changed, and leaving the reviewer wondering whether the MathJax is part of what they need to review.
- Sometimes it is not even clear that anything has changed, such as in this [example of an apparently empty suggested edit](https://scientific-speculation.codidact.com/posts/suggested-edit/428).
- Could edit summaries (for both edit reviewers and in edit histories) show the raw form of MathJax, in the same way that they currently show raw Markdown?
- Related: [Post revisions are displayed without rendered Markdown but with rendered MathJax](https://math.codidact.com/posts/280207)
- -----
- When reviewing a suggested edit, any MathJax is presented in its rendered form, making it difficult to see what has changed, and leaving the reviewer wondering whether the MathJax is part of what they need to review.
- Sometimes it is not even clear that anything has changed, such as in this [example of an apparently empty suggested edit](https://scientific-speculation.codidact.com/posts/suggested-edit/428).
- Could edit summaries (for both edit reviewers and in edit histories) show the raw form of MathJax, in the same way that they currently show raw Markdown?
#1: Initial revision
by
trichoplax
·
2023-02-18T15:58:56Z (almost 2 years ago)
Show raw MathJax in suggested edit diffs and edit histories
When reviewing a suggested edit, any MathJax is presented in its rendered form, making it difficult to see what has changed, and leaving the reviewer wondering whether the MathJax is part of what they need to review. Sometimes it is not even clear that anything has changed, such as in this [example of an apparently empty suggested edit](https://scientific-speculation.codidact.com/posts/suggested-edit/428). Could edit summaries (for both edit reviewers and in edit histories) show the raw form of MathJax, in the same way that they currently show raw Markdown?