Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Post History

87%
+12 −0
Q&A Should we have a network-wide policy against AI-generated answers?

We have posted our default policy for generative-AI content. It's more of a clarification than an actual change; as pointed out in another answer, representing Chat-GPT or any other content that yo...

posted 11mo ago by Monica Cellio‭

Answer
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Monica Cellio‭ · 2023-06-01T14:25:40Z (11 months ago)
We have posted our [default policy for generative-AI content](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/288194). It's more of a clarification than an actual *change*; as pointed out in another answer, representing Chat-GPT *or any other* content that you did not create as yours is plagiarism and was already disallowed.  When you use another's material you need to disclose it. Communities were also already empowered to moderate low-quality content, such as answers that consist entirely of quotes from unreliable sources.  That's true whether the unreliable source is a blog, AI output, or something you heard someone say at a conference.

Our communities have autonomy to make decisions about AI, either more strict or more lenient (within our attribution policies), and we'll support our moderators and communities however we can.