Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Post History

66%
+2 −0
Q&A How discussions work in Codidact?

Stack Overflow was created on the premise of having questions and answers without the chitchat and other common problems well-known in Internet discussion forums. The founders learned they still ne...

1 answer  ·  posted 1y ago by Wicket‭  ·  last activity 1y ago by Olin Lathrop‭

Question support meta
#6: Post edited by user avatar Wicket‭ · 2023-06-21T18:15:47Z (over 1 year ago)
  • Stack Overflow was created on the premise of having questions and answers without the chitchat and other common problems well-known in Internet discussion forums. The founders learned they still need a place where to have feedback from "community" and after several months they made a clone of the question-and-answer site to replace the original website used for gathering community input which lead to creating their "Meta" and at some point to introduce the use of meta tags: discussion, bug, support, and feature request.
  • That might work well enough for some time but as the "community" become more diverse "Meta" become a mess. I.E.:
  • 1. It's unclear the meaning of upvotes and downvotes. Some claimed that they mean agreement / disagreement respectively despite that the SO / Stack Exchange docs mention that meaning applies only to feature requests.
  • 2. There isn't a shared understanding of the meaning of "consensus".
  • 3. Several problems become worse due to [groupthink](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groupthink)
  • 4. ...
  • What measures are being taken in Codidact to avoid that Meta become a mess?
  • What measures are being taken to handle community wicked problems?
  • ----
  • From [Wikipedia (1)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groupthink)
  • > **Groupthink** is a psychological phenomenon that occurs within a group of people in which the desire for harmony or conformity in the group results in an irrational or dysfunctional decision-making outcome.
  • From [Wikipedia (2)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wicked_problem)
  • > In planning and policy, a **wicked problem** is a problem that is difficult or impossible to solve because of incomplete, contradictory, and changing requirements that are often difficult to recognize. It refers to an idea or problem that cannot be fixed, where there is no single solution to the problem; and "wicked" denotes resistance to resolution, rather than evil.[1] Another definition is "a problem whose social complexity means that it has no determinable stopping point".[2] Moreover, because of complex interdependencies, the effort to solve one aspect of a wicked problem may reveal or create other problems. Due to their complexity, wicked problems are often characterized by organized irresponsibility.
  • Stack Overflow was created on the premise of having questions and answers without the chitchat and other common problems well-known in Internet discussion forums. The founders learned they still need a place where to have feedback from "community" and after several months they made a clone of the question-and-answer site to replace the original website used for gathering community input which lead to creating their "Meta" and at some point to introduce the use of meta tags: discussion, bug, support, and feature request.
  • That might work well enough for some time but as the "community" become more diverse "Meta" become a mess. I.E.:
  • 1. It's unclear the meaning of upvotes and downvotes. Some claimed that they mean agreement / disagreement respectively despite that the SO / Stack Exchange docs mention that meaning applies only to feature requests.
  • 2. There isn't a shared understanding of the meaning of "consensus".
  • Some claim that a post having a lot of upvotes means that there is community consensus, while others claim that to have consensus is required that all community members agree on something.
  • 3. Several problems become worse due to [groupthink](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groupthink).
  • Some pro-tempore, community moderators, and community managers do reject to handle a situation just to avoid making mad a few community members.
  • 4. ...
  • What measures are being taken in Codidact to avoid that Meta become a mess?
  • What measures are being taken to handle community wicked problems?
  • ----
  • From [Wikipedia (1)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groupthink)
  • > **Groupthink** is a psychological phenomenon that occurs within a group of people in which the desire for harmony or conformity in the group results in an irrational or dysfunctional decision-making outcome.
  • From [Wikipedia (2)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wicked_problem)
  • > In planning and policy, a **wicked problem** is a problem that is difficult or impossible to solve because of incomplete, contradictory, and changing requirements that are often difficult to recognize. It refers to an idea or problem that cannot be fixed, where there is no single solution to the problem; and "wicked" denotes resistance to resolution, rather than evil.[1] Another definition is "a problem whose social complexity means that it has no determinable stopping point".[2] Moreover, because of complex interdependencies, the effort to solve one aspect of a wicked problem may reveal or create other problems. Due to their complexity, wicked problems are often characterized by organized irresponsibility.
#5: Post edited by user avatar Wicket‭ · 2023-06-21T18:11:31Z (over 1 year ago)
  • Stack Overflow was created on the premise of having questions and answers without the chitchat and other common problems well-known in Internet discussion forums. The founders learned they still need a place where to have feedback from "community" and after several months they made a clone of the question-and-answer site to replace the original website used for gathering community input which lead to creating their "Meta" and at some point to introduce the use of meta tags: discussion, bug, support, and feature request.
  • That might work well enough for some time but as the "community" become more diverse "Meta" become a mess. I.E.
  • 1. It's unclear the meaning of upvotes and downvotes,
  • 2. There isn't a shared understanding of the meaning of "consensus".
  • 3. Several problems become worse due to [groupthink](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groupthink)
  • 4. ...
  • What measures are being taken in Codidact to avoid that Meta become a mess?
  • What measures are being taken to handle community wicked problems?
  • ----
  • From [Wikipedia (1)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groupthink)
  • > **Groupthink** is a psychological phenomenon that occurs within a group of people in which the desire for harmony or conformity in the group results in an irrational or dysfunctional decision-making outcome.
  • From [Wikipedia (2)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wicked_problem)
  • > In planning and policy, a **wicked problem** is a problem that is difficult or impossible to solve because of incomplete, contradictory, and changing requirements that are often difficult to recognize. It refers to an idea or problem that cannot be fixed, where there is no single solution to the problem; and "wicked" denotes resistance to resolution, rather than evil.[1] Another definition is "a problem whose social complexity means that it has no determinable stopping point".[2] Moreover, because of complex interdependencies, the effort to solve one aspect of a wicked problem may reveal or create other problems. Due to their complexity, wicked problems are often characterized by organized irresponsibility.
  • Stack Overflow was created on the premise of having questions and answers without the chitchat and other common problems well-known in Internet discussion forums. The founders learned they still need a place where to have feedback from "community" and after several months they made a clone of the question-and-answer site to replace the original website used for gathering community input which lead to creating their "Meta" and at some point to introduce the use of meta tags: discussion, bug, support, and feature request.
  • That might work well enough for some time but as the "community" become more diverse "Meta" become a mess. I.E.:
  • 1. It's unclear the meaning of upvotes and downvotes. Some claimed that they mean agreement / disagreement respectively despite that the SO / Stack Exchange docs mention that meaning applies only to feature requests.
  • 2. There isn't a shared understanding of the meaning of "consensus".
  • 3. Several problems become worse due to [groupthink](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groupthink)
  • 4. ...
  • What measures are being taken in Codidact to avoid that Meta become a mess?
  • What measures are being taken to handle community wicked problems?
  • ----
  • From [Wikipedia (1)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groupthink)
  • > **Groupthink** is a psychological phenomenon that occurs within a group of people in which the desire for harmony or conformity in the group results in an irrational or dysfunctional decision-making outcome.
  • From [Wikipedia (2)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wicked_problem)
  • > In planning and policy, a **wicked problem** is a problem that is difficult or impossible to solve because of incomplete, contradictory, and changing requirements that are often difficult to recognize. It refers to an idea or problem that cannot be fixed, where there is no single solution to the problem; and "wicked" denotes resistance to resolution, rather than evil.[1] Another definition is "a problem whose social complexity means that it has no determinable stopping point".[2] Moreover, because of complex interdependencies, the effort to solve one aspect of a wicked problem may reveal or create other problems. Due to their complexity, wicked problems are often characterized by organized irresponsibility.
#4: Post edited by user avatar Wicket‭ · 2023-06-21T18:08:10Z (over 1 year ago)
Added quotes from Wikipedia for "groupthink" and "wicked problem"
  • Stack Overflow was created on the premise of having questions and answers without the chitchat and other common problems well-known in Internet discussion forums. The founders learned they still need a place where to have feedback from "community" and after several months they made a clone of the question-and-answer site to replace the original website used for gathering community input which lead to creating their "Meta" and at some point to introduce the use of meta tags: discussion, bug, support, and feature request.
  • That might work well enough for some time but as the "community" become more diverse "Meta" become a mess. I.E.
  • 1. It's unclear the meaning of upvotes and downvotes,
  • 2. There isn't a shared understanding of the meaning of "consensus".
  • 3. Several problems become worse due to [groupthink](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groupthink)
  • 4. ...
  • What measures are being taken in Codidact to avoid that Meta become a mess?
  • What measures are being taken to handle community wicked problems?
  • Stack Overflow was created on the premise of having questions and answers without the chitchat and other common problems well-known in Internet discussion forums. The founders learned they still need a place where to have feedback from "community" and after several months they made a clone of the question-and-answer site to replace the original website used for gathering community input which lead to creating their "Meta" and at some point to introduce the use of meta tags: discussion, bug, support, and feature request.
  • That might work well enough for some time but as the "community" become more diverse "Meta" become a mess. I.E.
  • 1. It's unclear the meaning of upvotes and downvotes,
  • 2. There isn't a shared understanding of the meaning of "consensus".
  • 3. Several problems become worse due to [groupthink](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groupthink)
  • 4. ...
  • What measures are being taken in Codidact to avoid that Meta become a mess?
  • What measures are being taken to handle community wicked problems?
  • ----
  • From [Wikipedia (1)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groupthink)
  • > **Groupthink** is a psychological phenomenon that occurs within a group of people in which the desire for harmony or conformity in the group results in an irrational or dysfunctional decision-making outcome.
  • From [Wikipedia (2)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wicked_problem)
  • > In planning and policy, a **wicked problem** is a problem that is difficult or impossible to solve because of incomplete, contradictory, and changing requirements that are often difficult to recognize. It refers to an idea or problem that cannot be fixed, where there is no single solution to the problem; and "wicked" denotes resistance to resolution, rather than evil.[1] Another definition is "a problem whose social complexity means that it has no determinable stopping point".[2] Moreover, because of complex interdependencies, the effort to solve one aspect of a wicked problem may reveal or create other problems. Due to their complexity, wicked problems are often characterized by organized irresponsibility.
#3: Post edited by user avatar Wicket‭ · 2023-06-21T18:04:02Z (over 1 year ago)
  • Stack Overflow was created on the premise of having questions and answers without the chitchat and other common problems well-known in Internet discussion forums. The founders learned they still need a place where to have feedback from "community" and after several months they made a clone of the question-and-answer site to replace the original website used for gathering community input which lead to creating their "Meta" and at some point to introduce the use of meta tags: discussion, bug, support, and feature request.
  • That might work well enough for some time but as the "community" become more diverse "Meta" become a mess. I.E. it's unclear the meaning of upvotes and downvotes.
  • What measures are being taken in Codidact to avoid that Meta become a mess?
  • What measures are being taken to handle community wicked problems?
  • Stack Overflow was created on the premise of having questions and answers without the chitchat and other common problems well-known in Internet discussion forums. The founders learned they still need a place where to have feedback from "community" and after several months they made a clone of the question-and-answer site to replace the original website used for gathering community input which lead to creating their "Meta" and at some point to introduce the use of meta tags: discussion, bug, support, and feature request.
  • That might work well enough for some time but as the "community" become more diverse "Meta" become a mess. I.E.
  • 1. It's unclear the meaning of upvotes and downvotes,
  • 2. There isn't a shared understanding of the meaning of "consensus".
  • 3. Several problems become worse due to [groupthink](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groupthink)
  • 4. ...
  • What measures are being taken in Codidact to avoid that Meta become a mess?
  • What measures are being taken to handle community wicked problems?
#2: Post edited by user avatar Wicket‭ · 2023-06-21T17:59:41Z (over 1 year ago)
  • Stack Overflow was created on the premise of having questions and answers without the chitchat and other common problems well-known in Internet discussion forums. The founders learned they still need a place where to have feedback from "community" and after several months they made a clone of the question-and-answer site to replace the original website used for gathering community input which lead to creating their "Meta" and at some point to introduce the use of meta tags: discussion, bug, support, and feature request.
  • That might work well enough for some time but as the "community" become more diverse "Meta" become a mess.
  • What measures are being taken in Codidact to avoid that Meta become a mess?
  • What measures are being taken to handle community wicked problems?
  • Stack Overflow was created on the premise of having questions and answers without the chitchat and other common problems well-known in Internet discussion forums. The founders learned they still need a place where to have feedback from "community" and after several months they made a clone of the question-and-answer site to replace the original website used for gathering community input which lead to creating their "Meta" and at some point to introduce the use of meta tags: discussion, bug, support, and feature request.
  • That might work well enough for some time but as the "community" become more diverse "Meta" become a mess. I.E. it's unclear the meaning of upvotes and downvotes.
  • What measures are being taken in Codidact to avoid that Meta become a mess?
  • What measures are being taken to handle community wicked problems?
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Wicket‭ · 2023-06-21T17:58:38Z (over 1 year ago)
How discussions work in Codidact?
Stack Overflow was created on the premise of having questions and answers without the chitchat and other common problems well-known in Internet discussion forums. The founders learned they still need a place where to have feedback from "community" and after several months they made a clone of the question-and-answer site to replace the original website used for gathering community input which lead to creating their "Meta" and at some point to introduce the use of meta tags: discussion, bug, support, and feature request.

That might work well enough for some time but as the "community" become more diverse "Meta" become a mess.

What measures are being taken in Codidact to avoid that Meta become a mess?

What measures are being taken to handle community wicked problems?