Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Post History

60%
+1 −0
Q&A Who should be able to create new tags?

Automatically collect new tags for review As Codidact communities grow, I can see a need to transition smoothly from the norms of a "new" site to those with open, wide participation. Initially, pe...

posted 1y ago by Karl Knechtel‭

Answer
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Karl Knechtel‭ · 2023-08-21T12:46:33Z (about 1 year ago)
## Automatically collect new tags for review

As Codidact communities grow, I can see a need to transition smoothly from the norms of a "new" site to those with open, wide participation. Initially, people should be trusted to create new tags, but eventually there will be a need to nip them in the bud.

What I envision is a system whereby - rather than directly obstructing tag creation - whenever the first question is asked in a new tag (i.e., the person asking the question is creating a tag, by applying it to the question), the site *highlights* this fact:

* By offering a filter on the Tags tab for tags *with exactly one question*. Then everyone can, at a minimum, propose an edit to remove the tag (or maybe fix its spelling or something); curators can just remove it. (The system should also automatically prune tags that have *zero* questions, unless usage information or a wiki exists; [currently, that doesn't appear to happen](https://meta.codidact.com/categories/3/tags/996)).

* Possibly, by allowing users with the Curate ability to *opt in to notifications* about newly-created tags.

* Possibly, by automatically generating a corresponding *post in the site's Meta* to discuss the proposed tag.

IMO, if sites *still* get to the point where excessive tag creation is a problem, *then* we can talk about a separate "Create Tag" ability.

## Blacklisting and synonymization

Regardless of the above, we are still going to want the abilities to

* Explicitly list tags that may not be (re-)created (Moderators and perhaps Curators should be able to input these manually, and also have a convenient option to add them when removing a new tag)

* Automatically transform tags into a canonical form (this information could be stored in the same place - i.e., have a mapping from the "bad" tag name to a "canonical" name, and simply omit the latter in order to prevent a tag from being used).