Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Post History

50%
+0 −0
Q&A Could we have a "Close as outdated" close reason?

I generally don't think this is a good idea. As you note, status-completed tags work fine for noting that a Meta process has run its course. If such a process has run its course - why not use the s...

posted 1y ago by Karl Knechtel‭

Answer
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Karl Knechtel‭ · 2023-09-13T20:26:55Z (about 1 year ago)
I generally don't think this is a good idea. As you note, status-completed tags work fine for noting that a Meta process has run its course. If such a process *has* run its course - why not use the same post for post-mortem discussion?

For main-space questions, if a question is about a problem that should be "obsolete", *that doesn't mean people will stop having to worry about it*. Especially in technical fields: legacy systems are all over the place. The financial sector is still heavily dependent on COBOL.

If anything needs to be added, I would suggest (if only for symmetry) allowing for the addition of "outdated" *reactions* on question posts. Which is to say, mark the post with all the information you describe, but don't close it.