Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Post History

75%
+4 −0
Q&A Notifying each other that a commented-on issue is resolved, to produce fewer comments rather than more

It is worth noting that we don't need to have the thread be deleted. Threads on Codidact can be locked and archived. Archived threads are still available for viewing, but cannot be commented on[1] ...

posted 1y ago by Moshi‭  ·  edited 1y ago by Moshi‭

Answer
#4: Post edited by user avatar Moshi‭ · 2023-09-18T09:32:07Z (about 1 year ago)
GitHub issue
  • It is worth noting that we don't need to have the thread be deleted. Threads on Codidact can be locked and archived. Archived threads are still available for viewing, but cannot be commented on[^1] and are hidden behind a "view more" button under the post.
  • [^1]: Though I've [proposed to change that](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/286243). There is also a suggestion to add a "resolved" state, which like archived would put hide it, but leave it available for further commenting.
  • Currently, only moderators can archive threads. However, we could think of letting any participant archive (and unarchive in case of further feedback - see footnote). Hopefully no one would abuse it, but restricting the action to participants and having other parties able to reverse archival would mitigate that. In addition, naturally, moderator archival would not be able to be overridden.
  • Codidact should ideally notify anyone following the thread when it is archived, but I'm not sure if it fits that yet; the feature has largely gone unused up to this point.
  • It is worth noting that we don't need to have the thread be deleted. Threads on Codidact can be locked and archived. Archived threads are still available for viewing, but cannot be commented on[^1] and are hidden behind a "view more" button under the post.
  • [^1]: Though I've [proposed to change that](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/286243). There is also a suggestion to add a "resolved" state, which like archived would put hide it, but leave it available for further commenting.
  • Currently, only moderators can archive threads. However, we could think of letting any participant archive (and unarchive in case of further feedback - see footnote). Hopefully no one would abuse it, but restricting the action to participants and having other parties able to reverse archival would mitigate that. In addition, naturally, moderator archival would not be able to be overridden.
  • Codidact should ideally notify anyone following the thread when it is archived, but it doesn't right now - I've created [a GitHub issue](https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/1202) to track this.
#3: Post edited by user avatar trichoplax‭ · 2023-09-18T00:40:36Z (about 1 year ago)
Typo
  • It is worth noting that we don't need to have the thread be deleted. Threads on Codidact can be locked and archived. Archived threads are still available for viewing, but cannot be commented on[^1] and are hidden behind a "view more" button under the post.
  • [^1]: Though I've [proposed to change that](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/286243). There is also a suggestion to add a "resolved" state, which like archived would put hide it, but leave it available for further commenting.
  • Currently, only moderators can archive threads. However, we could think of letting any participant archive (and unarchived in case of further feedback - see footnote). Hopefully no one would abuse it, but restricting the action to participants and having other parties able to reverse archival would mitigate that. In addition, naturally, moderator archival would not be able to be overridden.
  • Codidact should ideally notify anyone following the thread when it is archived, but I'm not sure if it fits that yet; the feature has largely gone unused up to this point.
  • It is worth noting that we don't need to have the thread be deleted. Threads on Codidact can be locked and archived. Archived threads are still available for viewing, but cannot be commented on[^1] and are hidden behind a "view more" button under the post.
  • [^1]: Though I've [proposed to change that](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/286243). There is also a suggestion to add a "resolved" state, which like archived would put hide it, but leave it available for further commenting.
  • Currently, only moderators can archive threads. However, we could think of letting any participant archive (and unarchive in case of further feedback - see footnote). Hopefully no one would abuse it, but restricting the action to participants and having other parties able to reverse archival would mitigate that. In addition, naturally, moderator archival would not be able to be overridden.
  • Codidact should ideally notify anyone following the thread when it is archived, but I'm not sure if it fits that yet; the feature has largely gone unused up to this point.
#2: Post edited by user avatar Moshi‭ · 2023-09-17T23:28:49Z (about 1 year ago)
Typo
  • It is worth noting that we don't need to be deleted. Threads on Codidact can be locked and archived. Archived threads are still available for viewing, but cannot be commented on[^1] and are hidden behind a "view more" button under the post.
  • [^1]: Though I've [proposed to change that](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/286243). There is also a suggestion to add a "resolved" state, which like archived would put hide it, but leave it available for further commenting.
  • Currently, only moderators can archive threads. However, we could think of letting any participant archive (and unarchived in case of further feedback - see footnote). Hopefully no one would abuse it, but restricting the action to participants and having other parties able to reverse archival would mitigate that. In addition, naturally, moderator archival would not be able to be overridden.
  • Codidact should ideally notify anyone following the thread when it is archived, but I'm not sure if it fits that yet; the feature has largely gone unused up to this point.
  • It is worth noting that we don't need to have the thread be deleted. Threads on Codidact can be locked and archived. Archived threads are still available for viewing, but cannot be commented on[^1] and are hidden behind a "view more" button under the post.
  • [^1]: Though I've [proposed to change that](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/286243). There is also a suggestion to add a "resolved" state, which like archived would put hide it, but leave it available for further commenting.
  • Currently, only moderators can archive threads. However, we could think of letting any participant archive (and unarchived in case of further feedback - see footnote). Hopefully no one would abuse it, but restricting the action to participants and having other parties able to reverse archival would mitigate that. In addition, naturally, moderator archival would not be able to be overridden.
  • Codidact should ideally notify anyone following the thread when it is archived, but I'm not sure if it fits that yet; the feature has largely gone unused up to this point.
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Moshi‭ · 2023-09-17T23:28:13Z (about 1 year ago)
It is worth noting that we don't need to be deleted. Threads on Codidact can be locked and archived. Archived threads are still available for viewing, but cannot be commented on[^1] and are hidden behind a "view more" button under the post. 

[^1]: Though I've [proposed to change that](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/286243). There is also a suggestion to add a "resolved" state, which like archived would put hide it, but leave it available for further commenting. 

Currently, only moderators can archive threads. However, we could think of letting any participant archive (and unarchived in case of further feedback - see footnote). Hopefully no one would abuse it, but restricting the action to participants and having other parties able to reverse archival would mitigate that. In addition, naturally, moderator archival would not be able to be overridden.

Codidact should ideally notify anyone following the thread when it is archived, but I'm not sure if it fits that yet; the feature has largely gone unused up to this point.