Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Communities drop-down/switcher upgrades

+9
−0

The communities "drop-down"/"switcher" menu next to the user profile could do with a few tweaks. The communities appearing there are sorted after order of community creation. That is: Writing, Codidact Meta, The Great Outdoors, ... This is a strange default order.

  • For searchability, it would make more sense if communities were displayed in alphabetic order.

  • For user-friendliness, it would make sense if the communities where the user is most active are those appearing on top. I don't think we need to over-engineer some sort of automatic identification system for this, but perhaps just give the users the possibility to customize the order (as seen Somewhere Else).

Similarly, the communities from https://codidact.com/ are also displayed in a strange order - not necessarily random(?) but based on activity or such? This also ought to be in alphabetic order.

Grouping based on some subjective evaluation about which community content that is more closely related to other communities (i.e Mathematics is close to Physics is close to Electrical Engineering...) is bound to get fuzzy and based on subjective opinions, so I would advise against that.

Perhaps with the exceptions of Codidact Meta and Codidact Proposals, that we might allow to get special status: as in always placed first/last in the list.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

Duplicate of this (1 comment)

1 answer

+3
−0

Any default order we implement -- including the current one, which is order of creation -- will be suboptimal sometimes. Sorting by activity or reputation also means the order might change from day to day, which those with stronger "muscle memory" will hate. I agree we should reconsider what the default, static order should be, but I think we also need to make this customizable.

I'd like to see some way (TBD) to specify an order, and have that order be followed in all of the following places:

  • the community switcher (dropdown list)
  • the dashboard
  • the "all communities" list when I am viewing my own profile

This way, I can put the communities I care most about -- regardless of how much reputation I've accumulated there or how many posts I've made -- at the top.

The list at https://codidact.com used to follow the same order as the switcher, but that page is a separate "front door" for our network, a static page to attract people to our communities, so we reordered it to put our most active communities first (aside from Meta, which, along with Proposals, we put at the end). That page is not tied into the software that runs the network, so we can't personalize it.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »