Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Post History
Counter-proposal: how about if we add the rep settings at the top of the Vote Summary page, instead of computing and adding them to each entry? I'm imagining something like this: Reputation for...
Answer
#1: Initial revision
by
Monica Cellio
·
2023-11-23T02:17:31Z (12 months ago)
Counter-proposal: how about if we add the rep settings at the top of the Vote Summary page, instead of computing and adding them to each entry? I'm imagining something like this: > Reputation for up/down votes: > Q&A: Question +5/-2, Answer +10/-2 > Sandbox: Article +0/-0 > Meta: Question +0/-0, Answer +0/-0 One line per category, listing each votable[^1] post type allowed in that category and the rep levels. This makes the values visible to everybody without adding a second number for each entry on the page. Or if there's a better place to expose this information, let's do that. People shouldn't have to guess what the rep changes mean, I agree. [^1]: Whether a post can be voted on is a property of the post type. For an example of non-votable posts, see the Descriptions category on the Proposals site.