Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Post History

50%
+1 −1
Q&A Probationary shadowban for new accounts

I only believe people should be banned if they did something wrong. They should be banned, and then should know that they are banned, why, and for how long. People who have not done anything wrong...

posted 1y ago by 90 98‭  ·  last activity 5mo ago by 90 98‭

Answer
#5: Post undeleted by user avatar 90 98‭ · 2024-07-26T01:58:17Z (5 months ago)
#4: Post edited by user avatar 90 98‭ · 2024-07-26T01:57:55Z (5 months ago)
Improved quality of answer
  • I don't think shadowbans are fair. If someone did something wrong, they should be banned, but then should know that they're banned, why, and for how long.
  • If someone didn't do something wrong, they shouldn't be banned at all.
  • I only believe people should be banned if they did something wrong. They should be banned, and then should know that they are banned, why, and for how long.
  • People who have not done anything wrong yet should not banned (shadowbanned) at all, if there is no pressing reason to do so. Unless Codidact receives a sudden spam wave caused by newly registered accounts, and they cannot be filtered in any other way, such as by applying IP-based blocks to locations from which large volumes of spam originate, applying a shadowban to **all** new accounts is unnecessarily degrading the experience to new users, by causing their posts to have zero engagement for seemingly no reason, until the shadowban expires.
  • I say no, unless a pressing need emerges, in which case, this should be a last resort.
#3: Post edited by user avatar 90 98‭ · 2024-04-02T04:28:04Z (9 months ago)
  • I don't think shadowbans are fair. If someone did something wrong, they should be banned, but then should know that they're banned, why, and for how long.
  • I don't think shadowbans are fair. If someone did something wrong, they should be banned, but then should know that they're banned, why, and for how long.
  • If someone didn't do something wrong, they shouldn't be banned at all.
#2: Post deleted by user avatar 90 98‭ · 2023-11-28T00:23:08Z (about 1 year ago)
#1: Initial revision by user avatar 90 98‭ · 2023-11-27T06:49:21Z (about 1 year ago)
I don't think shadowbans are fair. If someone did something wrong, they should be banned, but then should know that they're banned, why, and for how long.