Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Post History

84%
+9 −0
Q&A Please review a new Accessibility Statement and Accessibility Policy

status-completed Just a minor concern: I don't think a single person should be the point of contact, maybe set up something like access@codidact.org. That is, if it even needs a dedicated mail a...

posted 6mo ago by Lundin‭  ·  edited 6mo ago by Mithical‭

Answer
#2: Post edited by user avatar Mithical‭ · 2023-12-14T21:29:00Z (6 months ago)
mark as done
  • Just a minor concern: I don't think a single person should be the point of contact, maybe set up something like `access@codidact.org`. That is, if it even needs a dedicated mail address - I don't quite see why support@codidact.org address won't do?
  • If all accessibility concerns are routed to Mithical internally, that's all well and good. But I believe we should direct support requests to roles/titles rather than relying on a certain individual. Open source projects tend to suffer from people coming and going and on top of that, everyone's a volunteer. So someone else in the Codidact organization might have to step in during vacation/hiatus.
  • <a class="badge is-tag is-red is-outlined">status-completed</a>
  • ----
  • Just a minor concern: I don't think a single person should be the point of contact, maybe set up something like `access@codidact.org`. That is, if it even needs a dedicated mail address - I don't quite see why support@codidact.org address won't do?
  • If all accessibility concerns are routed to Mithical internally, that's all well and good. But I believe we should direct support requests to roles/titles rather than relying on a certain individual. Open source projects tend to suffer from people coming and going and on top of that, everyone's a volunteer. So someone else in the Codidact organization might have to step in during vacation/hiatus.
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Lundin‭ · 2023-12-05T14:35:20Z (6 months ago)
Just a minor concern: I don't think a single person should be the point of contact, maybe set up something like `access@codidact.org`. That is, if it even needs a dedicated mail address - I don't quite see why support@codidact.org address won't do?

If all accessibility concerns are routed to Mithical internally, that's all well and good. But I believe we should direct support requests to roles/titles rather than relying on a certain individual. Open source projects tend to suffer from people coming and going and on top of that, everyone's a volunteer. So someone else in the Codidact organization might have to step in during vacation/hiatus.