Welcome to Codidact Meta!
Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.
Post History
status-completed Just a minor concern: I don't think a single person should be the point of contact, maybe set up something like access@codidact.org. That is, if it even needs a dedicated mail a...
Answer
#2: Post edited
by
Mithical
·
2023-12-14T21:29:00Z (12 months ago)
mark as done
- Just a minor concern: I don't think a single person should be the point of contact, maybe set up something like `access@codidact.org`. That is, if it even needs a dedicated mail address - I don't quite see why support@codidact.org address won't do?
- If all accessibility concerns are routed to Mithical internally, that's all well and good. But I believe we should direct support requests to roles/titles rather than relying on a certain individual. Open source projects tend to suffer from people coming and going and on top of that, everyone's a volunteer. So someone else in the Codidact organization might have to step in during vacation/hiatus.
- <a class="badge is-tag is-red is-outlined">status-completed</a>
- ----
- Just a minor concern: I don't think a single person should be the point of contact, maybe set up something like `access@codidact.org`. That is, if it even needs a dedicated mail address - I don't quite see why support@codidact.org address won't do?
- If all accessibility concerns are routed to Mithical internally, that's all well and good. But I believe we should direct support requests to roles/titles rather than relying on a certain individual. Open source projects tend to suffer from people coming and going and on top of that, everyone's a volunteer. So someone else in the Codidact organization might have to step in during vacation/hiatus.
#1: Initial revision
by
Lundin
·
2023-12-05T14:35:20Z (12 months ago)
Just a minor concern: I don't think a single person should be the point of contact, maybe set up something like `access@codidact.org`. That is, if it even needs a dedicated mail address - I don't quite see why support@codidact.org address won't do? If all accessibility concerns are routed to Mithical internally, that's all well and good. But I believe we should direct support requests to roles/titles rather than relying on a certain individual. Open source projects tend to suffer from people coming and going and on top of that, everyone's a volunteer. So someone else in the Codidact organization might have to step in during vacation/hiatus.