Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Codidact Meta!

Codidact Meta is the meta-discussion site for the Codidact community network and the Codidact software. Whether you have bug reports or feature requests, support questions or rule discussions that touch the whole network – this is the site for you.

Post History

66%
+2 −0
Q&A Enhancing community involvement with per-site Help Centers

In particular, it appears that community moderators are able to edit the per-community Help Center documents (e.g. this listing for Meta itself) and perhaps add new ones. Yes. Community moder...

posted 11mo ago by Monica Cellio‭  ·  edited 11mo ago by Monica Cellio‭

Answer
#2: Post edited by user avatar Monica Cellio‭ · 2024-01-25T02:44:04Z (11 months ago)
  • > In particular, it appears that community moderators are able to edit the per-community Help Center documents (e.g. this listing for Meta itself) and perhaps add new ones.
  • Yes. Community moderators can edit all help topics except the network-policy ones. A community's Meta category is a good place to work out changes or new content.
  • The topics in the Policy column (About the Network, Legal) are editable only by Codidact staff. These topics cover things like the terms of service. Moderators also see a mod-only section that might be similarly restricted but I'm not sure.
  • > Why are the "Network FAQ" and "Codidact FAQ" separate documents?
  • The network FAQ is suitable for any instance, and is part of the seeded help in the software distribution. The Codidact Foundation FAQ is something we added to this instance to provide more transparency around the folks running this instance. We probably should have used that to *replace* the network FAQ. I might have fat-fingered an update; I'll look into it.
  • > If communities indeed set some of their own policies, it doesn't appear that there's any formal procedure for this.
  • I'm sorry for any confusion we've caused. In general, communities use Meta to determine things like scope, local policies, and so on, and we assumed the same would apply for editing help. We could make it more obvious that communities *can* edit the help, since that's not true on many other platforms. Thank you for raising this.
  • > In particular, it appears that community moderators are able to edit the per-community Help Center documents (e.g. this listing for Meta itself) and perhaps add new ones.
  • Yes. Community moderators can edit all help topics except the network-policy ones. A community's Meta category is a good place to work out changes or new content.
  • The topics in the Policy column (About the Network, Legal) are editable only by Codidact staff. These topics cover things like the terms of service. Moderators also see a mod-only section that might be similarly restricted but I'm not sure.
  • > Why are the "Network FAQ" and "Codidact FAQ" separate documents?
  • The network FAQ is suitable for any instance, and is part of the seeded help in the software distribution. The Codidact Foundation FAQ is something we added to this instance to provide more transparency around the folks running this instance. We probably should have used that to *replace* the network FAQ. I might have fat-fingered an update; I'll look into it.
  • > If communities indeed set some of their own policies, it doesn't appear that there's any formal procedure for this.
  • I'm sorry for any confusion we've caused. In general, communities use Meta to determine things like scope, local policies, and so on, and we assumed the same would apply for editing help. We have added a short intro to the help page to make it more obvious that communities *can* edit the help, since that's not true on many other platforms. Thank you for raising this.
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Monica Cellio‭ · 2024-01-23T04:15:27Z (11 months ago)
> In particular, it appears that community moderators are able to edit the per-community Help Center documents (e.g. this listing for Meta itself) and perhaps add new ones.

Yes.  Community moderators can edit all help topics except the network-policy ones.  A community's Meta category is a good place to work out changes or new content.

The topics in the Policy column (About the Network, Legal) are editable only by Codidact staff.  These topics cover things like the terms of service.  Moderators also see a mod-only section that might be similarly restricted but I'm not sure.

> Why are the "Network FAQ" and "Codidact FAQ" separate documents?

The network FAQ is suitable for any instance, and is part of the seeded help in the software distribution.  The Codidact Foundation FAQ is something we added to this instance to provide more transparency around the folks running this instance.  We probably should have used that to *replace* the network FAQ.  I might have fat-fingered an update; I'll look into it.

> If communities indeed set some of their own policies, it doesn't appear that there's any formal procedure for this.

I'm sorry for any confusion we've caused.  In general, communities use Meta to determine things like scope, local policies, and so on, and we assumed the same would apply for editing help.  We could make it more obvious that communities *can* edit the help, since that's not true on many other platforms.  Thank you for raising this.